Skip to main content
Tenders

BHCC - RS - Mile Oak Road - Residential development - 29 Homes

Open
Deadline
142 days left
August 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
023786-2026
Value
£14,400,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

August 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

August 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 16, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£14,400,000
Duration
41 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Competitive flexible procedure to appoint a main contractor to develop 29 council homes for affordable rent on Mile Oak Road Brighton. this will be awarded as a single stage (lump sum) JCT design and build 2024 contract.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements detailed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a main contractor.
--Capable of developing 29 council homes for affordable rent.
--Must be able to enter into a JCT design and build 2024 contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements detailed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements detailed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for residential development is generally well-structured with clear objectives and financial information. However, it lacks detail in technical and submission requirements, and sustainability aspects are not explicitly addressed.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract duration. The procedure type is specified, contributing to legal adherence.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the objective of developing 29 council homes for affordable rent and the contract type (JCT design and build 2024). However, the absence of specific technical capability and submission requirements reduces overall clarity.

No specific technical capability requirements detailed
No specific submission requirements detailed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of detailed technical and submission requirements, and the absence of content summaries for attached documents, detract from completeness.

No document content available
No specific technical capability requirements detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using a competitive flexible procedure. The eligibility requirements are broad, and there are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of a standard JCT contract also suggests a fair approach.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits its practicality for potential bidders. The availability of documents is noted, but their content is not accessible.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logically consistent, with the contract start date aligning with the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these important sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project objective and contract type
Disclosure of estimated value
Well-defined CPV code and NUTS code
Active status with reasonable deadlines

Concerns

Lack of detailed technical and submission requirements
No content available for tender documents
Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)
No e-submission specified

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical capability and submission requirements.
2. Include information on sustainability aspects and how they will be evaluated.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide accessible content for tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline