Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Property Flood Resilience (PFR) grant scheme film

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 26, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027341-2026
Value
£5,000
Location
Cornwall and Isles of Scilly, United Kingdom
Published
April 08, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 19, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 26, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 04, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£5,000
Duration
11 months
Location
Cornwall and Isles of Scilly
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

A short film promoting the Council's Property Flood Resilience (PFR) grant scheme project.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
027341-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
027341-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
027341-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a promotional film is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for an open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline relative to the contract start date could be tighter.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required film is clear and concise. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical capability, financial, and submission requirements significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders.

No specific requirements listed for eligibility, technical capability, financial, or submission.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and duration. However, the lack of detailed requirements and attached document content (summaries only) makes the tender less complete.

No document content available, only summaries.
No specific requirements listed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the process is generally objective. The lack of specific tailored requirements suggests a fair approach.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of financing information reduce its practicality.

No e-submission mentioned.
Financing information not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization.
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration.
Appropriate CPV code provided.
Open competition procedure.

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission).
Missing evaluation criteria.
No document content available, only summaries.
No explicit mention of e-submission.

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed requirements for bidders.
2. Specify evaluation criteria clearly.
3. Upload full tender documents for review.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline