Qualification Scheme for the procurement of land surveying and measuring services and equipment for surveying

This tender establishes a qualification system for land surveying services and equipment. While generally well-structured with clear objectives and available documentation, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial information, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to the Utilities Directive (2014/25/EU) and uses a proper CPV code. The procedure is identified as 'competition' within an 'Open Procedure' framework. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline is unusually far in the future. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance appears to be met.

The purpose of the qualification system is clearly stated, aiming to create a list of qualified suppliers for land surveying services and equipment. The division into categories is mentioned. However, specific evaluation criteria are missing, which affects the overall clarity of the selection process.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. The description is provided, and documents are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are key elements for a complete tender.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. Access to documents is provided. The criteria for qualification are generally described as being qualified for the services, which is objective. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. The lack of disclosed value does not inherently reduce fairness but is a point of concern for potential bidders.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. Documents are available. However, the extremely distant submission deadline (2050-01-01) is impractical and likely an error. Information regarding financing is not provided, and the contract start date is missing.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The status is 'active'. No suspension or disputes are reported. The dates provided, while one is exceptionally far in the future, are logically presented within the tender structure.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided text. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria within this tender.