Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Multidisciplinary Engineering Consultancy Services Contract

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024789-2026
Value
£1,320,000
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
April 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 29, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,320,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The procurement of Engineering Consultancy Services across multiple disciplines ahead of a hybrid planning application submission for the Winstanley Neighbourhood Renewal Plan.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
024789-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
024789-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
024789-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for multidisciplinary engineering consultancy services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and accessible tender documents, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially tight, is within a reasonable timeframe for an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required services is clear, outlining the need for engineering consultancy for a hybrid planning application. The AI-extracted requirements list key categories, but the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content or summaries is a major deficiency.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the criteria are stated to be objective, though not detailed. The lack of explicit mention of e-submission is a minor concern for fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of explicit mention of e-submission and the lack of accessible document URLs reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these important sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No accessible tender document content
Potential for a short submission deadline
Lack of explicit e-submission

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Upload full tender documents with content and ensure URLs are accessible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline