Banking Services for Client Property and Money Management

This tender for banking services exhibits significant deficiencies in completeness, clarity, and data consistency, primarily due to missing critical information and the inclusion of an irrelevant document summary.

The tender defines a restricted, competitive flexible procedure and assigns a CPV code. However, the specific procedure codes are missing, and the AI summary indicates a lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds. The reveal date is also not specified.

While the service description is clear, the tender suffers from a critical lack of clarity due to unspecified evaluation criteria. Furthermore, specific financial requirements and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds are noted as missing in the AI summary, and the presence of an irrelevant document summary (Document 1) adds significant confusion.

The tender provides basic information, deadlines, and value. However, it is critically incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria, detailed financial requirements, and specific mandatory exclusion grounds. The inclusion of a termination notice for a different council/tender (Document 1 summary) indicates a severe flaw in the document package's completeness and relevance.

The lack of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness and transparency of the procurement process. The absence of e-submission, as flagged by automated checks, also creates barriers to equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored.

The tender's practicality is significantly hampered by the lack of electronic submission support. While duration and contract start are specified, the presence of an irrelevant document summary (Document 1) makes navigating the tender package less practical for bidders.

A major inconsistency exists with the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline, which is illogical. Furthermore, the summary of Document 1, a termination notice for a different council and tender, represents a severe data consistency failure within the provided tender information.

The tender explicitly lacks any focus on green procurement, social criteria, or innovation, as indicated by automated checks. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.