Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Lincoln College Air Source Heat Pumps and Electrical Upgrades - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Open
Deadline
8 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023081-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Published
April 08, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 28, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
14 months
Location
South Yorkshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Salix PSDS Phase 4 - Lincoln College Air Source Heat Pumps and Electrical Upgrades - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
023081-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
023081-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
023081-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for air source heat pumps and electrical upgrades at Lincoln College is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable omissions.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, with a clear CPV code and NUTS code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and there are no immediate flags for regulatory non-compliance or disputes. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) indicate a structured approach. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria means bidders cannot fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and deadline is present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available for review, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. Requirements are listed generically, without apparent tailoring to specific companies. The value is classified but not disclosed, which is a slight concern for transparency. The lack of explicit e-submission details is a minor point.

Value Classified: Yes (but not disclosed)
Practicality65/100

The contract duration and start date are provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the lack of explicit e-submission guidance might pose a minor hurdle. The availability of document URLs is not confirmed.

No e-submission
Financing info not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears consistent with the active status of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these modern procurement characteristics.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
CPV code and NUTS code specified
Requirements generally outlined

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Content of tender documents not available
Lack of explicit sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value for greater transparency.
2. Provide clear evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
3. Specify if e-submission is mandatory and provide relevant links/instructions.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline