Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Sudan Stability Programme (SSP)

Open
Deadline
120 days left
August 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
022122-2026
Value
£30,000,000
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

July 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

August 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

December 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£30,000,000
Duration
61 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) are exploring the option to procure a delivery partner/consortium who can lead our work on civil society and protection of civilians in Sudan for The Sudan Stability Programme (SSP). FCDO will be using market feedback from Preliminary Market Engagement (ME) activities to inform the design of the programme. Please note that the programme is subject to changes and approvals. The SSP is a new programme following on from the Sudan Stability and Growth Programme (SSGP), which aims to continue and deepen the UK’s conflict resolution and mitigation work previously delivered. With no permanent UK presence in Sudan and a rapidly evolving conflict environment, the SSP will support local civil society, strengthen civilian protection, and reinforce national and regional diplomatic efforts. Building the conditions for a national-level dialogue with engagement from civil actors. The SSP’s key objectives are to: • Support grassroots civil society groups and local conflict management as means to promote social cohesion and mitigate protection risks. • Strengthening local governance institutions and promoting inclusivity, particularly considering women and other marginalised groups. • Countering misinformation, disinformation and hate speech • Producing continual conflict and political analysis that informs programmatic interventions and a broader Thinking and Working Politically approach that supports diplomatic efforts. The SSP is expected to have an overall value of up to £39 million over five years, with this specific component expected to receive approximately £6 million annually. Subject to internal approval and funding confirmation, programme delivery is expected to begin in FY 2027. The EME session will be held on Wednesday 25th March 2026 from 11:00 - 13:00 (UK time). Location: Virtual EME session via Microsoft Team, joining instructions and slides ill be shared closer to the day. To register please use the following link: https://forms.office.com/e/3uWwwQXcgk Purpose of the EME: - Provide suppliers with an overview of the programme parameters, operating assumptions, and overarching theory of change, as well as the anticipated delivery approaches for working in a high risk, low access environment. - Introduce the indicative outcome areas and potential scope of partner activities, including expectations for partnerships and consortia arrangements. - Gather feedback from attendees to inform the design and development of the SSP Business Case and wider programme. FCDO is particularly seeking insights on operating risks in-country, and the feasibility of the proposed grant management approach. A set of targeted questions will be shared in advance of the session for suppliers to consider. Please Note: All information shared during the EME may be subject to change. The programme remains in its early design and development phase, and feedback from this session will play a critical role in shaping the final approach. Attendees are therefore encouraged to engage actively and demonstrate relevant expertise.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (8)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Suppliers must register for the EME session via the provided link: https://forms.office.com/e/3uWwwQXcgk
--Suppliers are encouraged to engage actively and demonstrate relevant expertise during the EME session.
--A set of targeted questions will be shared in advance of the EME session for suppliers to consider.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Suppliers must demonstrate expertise in civil society engagement and protection of civilians in Sudan.
--Suppliers should be capable of leading work on civil society and protection of civilians.
--Suppliers should be able to operate in a high-risk, low-access environment.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Ability to support grassroots civil society groups and local conflict management.
--Ability to strengthen local governance institutions and promote inclusivity, particularly considering women and other marginalised groups.
--Ability to counter misinformation, disinformation, and hate speech.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The programme has an overall value of up to £39 million over five years.
--This specific component is expected to receive approximately £6 million annually.
--The tender has an additional value listed as 30,000,000 EUR, which may be a separate component or an error in translation/representation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is in the planning phase, indicating a need for detailed development and potential adjustments. While core information is present, crucial elements like evaluation criteria are missing, and the procurement process is not yet fully defined.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in the planning phase, with no formal procedure yet defined. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines and contract start dates are provided, but the submission deadline appears to be for an EME session rather than a full tender submission, which is a potential point of confusion. No disputes are reported.

Submission deadline is for EME session, not final tender.
Clarity80/100

The description of the programme objectives and activities is clear. Requirements are largely outlined in the AI-extracted section, providing good detail on expected capabilities and expertise. However, specific evaluation criteria are not yet defined.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and duration is present. The CPV code is provided. However, the status 'planning' and the absence of a formal procedure indicate that many essential tender documents and details are yet to be released. No document content is available.

Programme is in planning phase; full tender documentation not yet available.
No document content/summaries provided.
Fairness85/100

The use of Preliminary Market Engagement (EME) to gather feedback is a positive step towards fair design. The objectives and scope are reasonably well-articulated. No specific company tailoring is evident. The potential for consortiums is also a sign of openness. The value is disclosed.

Practicality65/100

The EME session has a clear registration process via a provided URL. However, the overall tender submission process is not yet defined, and there is no mention of e-submission for the final tender. Financing information is implied through value and duration. The contract start date is specified.

No defined e-submission method for the final tender.
No information on financing mechanisms beyond estimated value.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, organization, value, and contract duration are populated. Dates for the EME are logical. The reference number is present. No suspension or disputes are noted. The dual reporting of value (EUR and GBP) might need clarification upon final tender release.

Potential discrepancy between EUR and GBP values needs clarification.
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the provided information. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded.

No explicit sustainability or green procurement criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear programme description and objectives.
Use of Preliminary Market Engagement (EME) to inform design.
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration.
Appropriate CPV code identified.

Concerns

Programme is in planning phase; critical tender details are missing.
Lack of defined evaluation criteria and formal procurement procedure.
Ambiguity regarding submission deadlines (EME vs. final tender).

Recommendations

1. Provide a detailed timeline for the full procurement process, including the release of tender documents and final submission deadlines.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria that will be used to assess bids.
3. Specify the e-submission platform and requirements for the final tender submission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline