Skip to main content
Tenders

Sudan Stability Programme (SSP)

Open
Deadline
129 days left
August 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
022122-2026
Value
£30,000,000
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

July 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

August 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

December 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£30,000,000
Duration
61 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

FCDO is exploring the procurement of a delivery partner/consortium for civil society and protection of civilians in Sudan for The Sudan Stability Programme (SSP). The SSP aims to continue and deepen UK’s conflict resolution and mitigation work. It will support local civil society, strengthen civilian protection, and reinforce diplomatic efforts. Key objectives include supporting grassroots civil society, strengthening local governance, countering misinformation, and producing conflict analysis. Expected value up to £39 million over five years. Preliminary Market Engagement session on Wednesday 25th March 2026.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (8)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Suppliers must register for the EME session via the provided link: https://forms.office.com/e/3uWwwQXcgk
--Suppliers are encouraged to engage actively and demonstrate relevant expertise during the EME session.
--A set of targeted questions will be shared in advance of the EME session for suppliers to consider.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Suppliers must demonstrate expertise in civil society engagement and protection of civilians in Sudan.
--Suppliers should be capable of leading work on civil society and protection of civilians.
--Suppliers should be able to operate in a high-risk, low-access environment.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Ability to support grassroots civil society groups and local conflict management.
--Ability to strengthen local governance institutions and promote inclusivity, particularly considering women and other marginalised groups.
--Ability to counter misinformation, disinformation, and hate speech.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The programme has an overall value of up to £39 million over five years.
--This specific component is expected to receive approximately £6 million annually.
--The tender has an additional value listed as 30,000,000 EUR, which may be a separate component or an error in translation/representation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is in the planning phase, indicating a need for detailed development and potential adjustments. While core information is present, crucial elements like evaluation criteria are missing, and the procurement process is not yet fully defined.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in the planning phase, with no formal procedure yet defined. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines and contract start dates are provided, but the submission deadline appears to be for an EME session rather than a full tender submission, which is a potential point of confusion. No disputes are reported.

Submission deadline is for EME session, not final tender.
Clarity80/100

The description of the programme objectives and activities is clear. Requirements are largely outlined in the AI-extracted section, providing good detail on expected capabilities and expertise. However, specific evaluation criteria are not yet defined.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and duration is present. The CPV code is provided. However, the status 'planning' and the absence of a formal procedure indicate that many essential tender documents and details are yet to be released. No document content is available.

Programme is in planning phase; full tender documentation not yet available.
No document content/summaries provided.
Fairness85/100

The use of Preliminary Market Engagement (EME) to gather feedback is a positive step towards fair design. The objectives and scope are reasonably well-articulated. No specific company tailoring is evident. The potential for consortiums is also a sign of openness. The value is disclosed.

Practicality65/100

The EME session has a clear registration process via a provided URL. However, the overall tender submission process is not yet defined, and there is no mention of e-submission for the final tender. Financing information is implied through value and duration. The contract start date is specified.

No defined e-submission method for the final tender.
No information on financing mechanisms beyond estimated value.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, organization, value, and contract duration are populated. Dates for the EME are logical. The reference number is present. No suspension or disputes are noted. The dual reporting of value (EUR and GBP) might need clarification upon final tender release.

Potential discrepancy between EUR and GBP values needs clarification.
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the provided information. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded.

No explicit sustainability or green procurement criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear programme description and objectives.
Use of Preliminary Market Engagement (EME) to inform design.
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration.
Appropriate CPV code identified.

Concerns

Programme is in planning phase; critical tender details are missing.
Lack of defined evaluation criteria and formal procurement procedure.
Ambiguity regarding submission deadlines (EME vs. final tender).

Recommendations

1. Provide a detailed timeline for the full procurement process, including the release of tender documents and final submission deadlines.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria that will be used to assess bids.
3. Specify the e-submission platform and requirements for the final tender submission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline