Tenders

Residential Development of Former NHS Clinic, Foster Street, Maidstone.

Open
Deadline
55 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
017863-2026
Value
£3,208,800
Location
Kent, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 28, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£3,208,800
Duration
14 months
Location
Kent
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Maidstone Borough Council is seeking a contractor for high-quality design and construction works to deliver new affordable housing schemes. The development will redevelop the former NHS clinic site into 8 semi-detached houses with associated parking and landscaping. More information and response submission are available via the Delta eSourcing portal.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for residential development is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure for an open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the project scope. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the development of 8 semi-detached houses. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria mean that crucial details for bidders are missing.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of an e-sourcing portal is a positive aspect.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes an e-sourcing portal for information and response, which is practical. However, the contract start date is relatively soon after the submission deadline, and the duration is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No explicit financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The tender is active with no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability elements.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives
Open competition procedure
Use of e-sourcing portal
All basic information present

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Potentially short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Upload full tender documents with comprehensive content.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if feasible, given the project's scope.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline