Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Residential Development of Former NHS Clinic, Foster Street, Maidstone.

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
017863-2026
Value
£3,208,800
Location
Kent, United Kingdom
Published
April 09, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 28, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£3,208,800
Duration
14 months
Location
Kent
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Maidstone Borough Council is looking to appoint a contractor to provide high quality design and construction works to deliver new affordable housing schemes. The development proposals will deliver the redevelopment of the former NHS clinic, Foster Street, Maidstone to deliver 8 semi-detached houses with associated car parking and landscaping. For more information about this opportunity, please visit the Delta eSourcing portal at: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-Maidstone:-Construction-work./267HKM57NM To respond to this opportunity, please click here: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/267HKM57NM

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
017863-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
017863-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
017863-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for residential development is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure for an open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the project scope. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the development of 8 semi-detached houses. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria mean that crucial details for bidders are missing.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of an e-sourcing portal is a positive aspect.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes an e-sourcing portal for information and response, which is practical. However, the contract start date is relatively soon after the submission deadline, and the duration is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No explicit financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The tender is active with no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability elements.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives
Open competition procedure
Use of e-sourcing portal
All basic information present

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Potentially short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Upload full tender documents with comprehensive content.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if feasible, given the project's scope.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline