Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login18 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No processed documents available for this tender.
Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.
This tender for the CUE & Butterfly House Decarbonisation project is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a defined scope. Key areas for improvement include the availability of tender documents, explicit evaluation criteria, and a more streamlined e-submission process.
The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including the use of a proper CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. Deadlines, while potentially tight given the scope, are present. There is no indication of disputes or regulatory non-compliance within the provided text.
The description of the project's objectives and the specific decarbonisation works required is clear and detailed. Technical requirements are well-defined, specifying the type of systems and improvements needed. The contract form (JCT intermediate form without quantities) is also clearly stated.
Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, critical tender documents are not accessible, and crucial information such as reveal date and evaluation criteria is missing, impacting the completeness score.
The tender generally promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and specifying objective technical requirements. The use of a competitive flexible procedure suggests an open process. However, the lack of readily available tender documents and explicit evaluation criteria could potentially hinder equal access for all potential bidders.
The tender specifies a contract start date that coincides with the submission deadline, which is impractical. The lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of accessible tender documents make the submission process less practical. Financing information is not detailed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract start date, though impractical in relation to the submission deadline, is present and consistent with other date fields.
The project's core objective is decarbonisation, aligning with environmental goals. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria beyond the project's inherent nature, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required