Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Copmanthorpe Primary School - Fencing, Fire Doors and Asbestos

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
004359-2026
Value
£204,000
Location
North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Published
April 03, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 23, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£204,000
Duration
2 months
Location
North Yorkshire
Type
Open Procedure
57
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

The City of York Council has an opportunity for Copmanthorpe Primary School - Fencing, Fire Doors and Asbestos

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the tender by the deadline of 2026-02-23T12:00:00+00:00.
--The tender submission must clearly address both price and quality, as the award criteria are 60% quality and 40% price.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds were identified from the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements were identified from the provided summaries.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Demonstrate capability to perform fencing works.
--Demonstrate capability to perform fire door installation and/or supply works (CPV category 44221220).
--Demonstrate capability to perform asbestos removal works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements were identified from the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
004359-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about the City of York Council's open tender for fencing, fire doors, and asbestos work at Copmanthorpe Primary School, detailing the buyer and basic tender information.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
004359-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package offers standardized, machine-readable data detailing the City of York Council's open tender for fencing, fire doors, and asbestos work at Copmanthorpe Primary School, including buyer information and tender specifics.

Official PDF VersionPDF
004359-2026_official.pdf

The City of York Council is seeking tenders for fencing, fire doors, and asbestos works at Copmanthorpe Primary School, with an estimated value of £170,000 and a submission deadline of February 23, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

57
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides basic information but exhibits significant gaps in legal compliance, clarity, and completeness, particularly concerning exclusion, eligibility, and detailed evaluation criteria. The absence of e-submission and disregard for sustainability aspects are also notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance55/100

The tender lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements, which are serious legal deficiencies. The assigned CPV code is too narrow for the scope of works, and the reveal date is missing, impacting transparency.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Clarity65/100

While the award criteria split (60% quality, 40% price) is specified, the detailed evaluation criteria for the 'quality' component are not provided in the summaries, significantly reducing clarity for potential bidders. The overall set of requirements is not comprehensive.

Missing detailed quality evaluation criteria
Overall requirements are not comprehensive
Completeness60/100

Basic information is present, but the significant absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and detailed quality evaluation criteria renders the tender substantially incomplete.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness60/100

The lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria introduces subjectivity into the evaluation process, potentially impacting fairness. Furthermore, the absence of electronic submission (e-submission) creates a barrier to equal access for all potential bidders.

Lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria
No e-submission option
Practicality50/100

The absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, making the tender process less efficient and accessible for bidders. While other practical elements like contract start and duration are clear, this omission is critical.

No e-submission option
Data Consistency70/100

A notable inconsistency exists in the estimated value, stated as 204,000.00 EUR in the basic information but £170,000 in document summaries. Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and 'Type/Procedure Code' are also unpopulated.

Inconsistent estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
Missing 'Liable Person'
Sustainability20/100

The tender completely lacks any mention or integration of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity for sustainable public procurement practices.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Basic information (title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, value, duration) is provided
Procedure type is clearly defined as 'Open' and 'Below threshold - open competition'
Value is disclosed and not classified
Documents are available (4 listed, including OCDS data for transparency)
Award criteria split (60% quality, 40% price) is specified

Concerns

Significant gaps in legal compliance (missing mandatory exclusion, eligibility, financial requirements)
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for the 60% quality component
Narrow CPV code for the broad scope of works
No electronic submission option, hindering practicality and equal access
Absence of any sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria

Recommendations

1. Enhance legal compliance and completeness by including all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements.
2. Improve clarity and fairness by providing detailed, objective evaluation criteria for the 'quality' component.
3. Modernize the submission process by implementing electronic submission (e-submission).

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline