Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginUpgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login29 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.
LoginThis tender for financial management software is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a defined process. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and clarity.
The tender adheres to general legal compliance by specifying a clear procedure (Competitive Flexible Procedure), a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are provided, though the contract start date coinciding with the submission deadline is unusual. The procedure itself is compliant with open tendering principles.
The description of the required software and the Trust's needs is generally clear. Key requirements such as cloud-based, compatibility, and DFE Chart of Accounts compliance are specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria for Stage 2 is a significant clarity issue.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the lack of available content for the tender documents and the missing reveal date for the submission deadline reduce its completeness.
The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value, using an e-procurement portal, and outlining objective criteria for Stage 2 (price, technical, support). The competitive flexible procedure with a defined number of candidates progressing to Stage 2 is also a fair approach. No specific company tailoring is evident.
The tender utilizes an e-submission portal, which enhances practicality. However, the contract start date coinciding with the submission deadline is impractical. Financing information is implicitly linked to the estimated value, but not explicitly detailed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the contract duration aligning with the stated start and end dates.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a moderate score.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required