Skip to main content
Tenders

MVH26010 - Remedial Works at 47 Bro Dawel

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023505-2026
Value
£90,000
Location
West Wales and The Valleys, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Budget
£90,000
Duration
3 months
Location
West Wales and The Valleys
Type
Open Procedure
71
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Merthyr Valleys Homes requirement for Remedial Works at 47 Bro Dawel Merthyr Tydfil. Expected duration: 12 – 16 weeks.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

71
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a moderate level of quality, with strong fairness and data consistency but lacking in clarity and sustainability aspects. Significant improvements in documentation and evaluation criteria are recommended.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for below-threshold procurement. It specifies a procedure and provides essential identifiers. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural lapse. The deadlines seem reasonable for the scope.

Clarity60/100

The description of the works is very brief, and crucially, there are no specified criteria for evaluation or any explicit requirements (mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission). This lack of detail significantly hinders understanding and objective comparison of bids.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are present. However, the absence of specific requirements and detailed documentation (only 0 documents with content) makes the tender incomplete for a meaningful bidding process.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting fairness. The value is disclosed, and there are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The procedure is below threshold but open, which is generally fair. E-submission is not explicitly mentioned as mandatory, which could be a minor point.

Practicality65/100

The submission deadline is provided, and the contract start date is logical. However, the lack of explicit e-submission and the absence of detailed contract documents make the practical execution of the submission and evaluation process less efficient. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission (implied)
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability40/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or if the tender is EU funded. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations in the tender design.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value disclosed
Open competition procedure
Logical date sequencing

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
Absence of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
No document content available for bidders
No sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria and specific requirements for all categories.
2. Upload all relevant tender documents with comprehensive content.
3. Incorporate sustainability elements (green, social, innovation) if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline