Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

CRM Platform (Donor and Session Programme)

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
025589-2026
Value
£4,000,000
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, United Kingdom
Published
April 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£4,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

NHS Blood and Transplant is progressing with the Donor and Session Platform (DASP) Programme, a transformative digital programme that aims to modernise donor engagement and session delivery. To deliver DASP effectively, NHSBT intend to procure: Three strategic delivery partners to work alongside NHSBT teams. A CRM platform and software components. Procurement will be phased and NHSBT are now starting engagement with suppliers who can meet requirements for a CRM Platform for the Donor and Session Programme.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
025589-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
025589-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
025589-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a CRM platform is in the planning stage, with a clear description of the program's goals. Key information is present, but crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content are missing, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in the planning phase, and while basic information like CPV code is present, the absence of a specified procedure type and the 'None' status for procedure code suggest it's not yet a formal procurement. Deadlines are provided, but the overall legal framework for the actual procurement is not yet established. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the Donor and Session Platform (DASP) Programme and the need for a CRM platform is clear. The AI-extracted requirements list general categories, but specific documented requirements and evaluation criteria are missing, which affects overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria mean that essential details for potential bidders are missing.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is in the planning stage, and no specific company requirements are evident. The value is disclosed, and the deadline appears reasonable for a planning notice. The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a concern for fairness in the future procurement process.

Practicality65/100

The tender is in the planning stage, and e-submission is not explicitly mentioned. The contract start date is provided, and the duration is clear. However, the lack of document content and specific details about financing information limits its immediate practicality for bidders.

No e-submission mentioned
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical for a planning notice. There are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided information. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria in this planning notice.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear program description
Basic tender information provided
Estimated value and duration disclosed
CPV code specified

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No content in tender documents
Lack of sustainability focus
E-submission not specified

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documents with detailed specifications.
2. Clearly define evaluation criteria for the upcoming procurement.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline