Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Joseph Chamberlain 6th Form College MFD Partner

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
010313-2026
Value
£840,000
Location
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Published
April 02, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£840,000
Duration
60 months
Location
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire
Type
Restricted Procedure
55
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

Joseph Chamberlain 6th Form College seeks an innovative and forward-looking partner to support the delivery and development of its Multi-Functional Device (MFD) provision over the next five years. The current fleet comprises 4 Reprographics machines and 21 other machines, all Ricoh. The procurement includes the provision of a range of MFDs, installation, commissioning, handover, training, uniform maintenance, automated consumable management, print management software, ethical disposal of equipment, full service level agreement, monitoring, management, reporting, and relevant training. The college has approximately 3,100 students and 250 staff and was rated Outstanding by OFSTED in February 2024.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (15)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a bid by the deadline: 2026-05-01T00:00:00+01:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The provided text does not explicitly list any mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to provide services in Birmingham, United Kingdom.
--Ability to operate as a partner for a 5-year contract duration.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS15
--Ability to provide a range of multi-functional printing devices (MFDs) to the college.
--Capability to provide an installation and commissioning service for each device.
--Capability to provide a handover and training service for the devices.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Ability to deliver services within an estimated contract value of 840,000 EUR over 60 months.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
010313-2026_ocds_record.json

Joseph Chamberlain Sixth Form College is seeking a partner for a five-year contract to supply, install, maintain, and manage a fleet of multi-functional printing devices, including consumables, software, and related services, for its 3,100 students and 250 staff.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
010313-2026_ocds_release.json

Joseph Chamberlain Sixth Form College seeks a partner for a five-year contract to provide, install, maintain, and manage a fleet of multi-functional printing devices (MFDs), including reprographics machines, for its 3,100 students and 250 staff.

Official PDF VersionPDF
010313-2026_official.pdf

Joseph Chamberlain Sixth Form College seeks an innovative partner for a five-year contract to provide, install, maintain, and manage a fleet of multi-functional printing devices, including software, consumables, and ethical disposal services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

55
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender for MFD services presents a clear scope but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and significant data inconsistencies, including an impossible contract start date and irrelevant attached documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes, but missing procedure codes and an illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline) raise concerns about adherence to best practices for contract commencement. The irrelevant 'Tender Notice' document also suggests a potential data integrity issue.

Missing procedure codes for 'Restricted' and 'Competitive flexible procedure'
Contract start date is identical to submission deadline, which is legally problematic for contract commencement
Clarity50/100

While the description of services and AI-extracted requirements are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders the clarity of the selection process for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness60/100

Basic tender information is present, but the crucial omission of evaluation criteria is a major gap. Furthermore, one document failed to download, and another (Tender Notice) is entirely irrelevant, indicating issues with the completeness and accuracy of supporting documentation.

No evaluation criteria specified
One document failed to download ('Attachment A-11499')
Fairness55/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements are generally generic. However, the lack of electronic submission and, more critically, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria severely compromise the fairness and objectivity of the procurement process.

No evaluation criteria specified, compromising transparency and objectivity
No e-submission supported
Practicality40/100

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback. The contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is highly impractical and suggests a procedural error.

No electronic submission supported
Contract start date is identical to submission deadline, which is impractical for contract award and commencement
Data Consistency45/100

There are significant data consistency issues, notably the illogical contract start date matching the submission deadline. The inclusion of an entirely irrelevant 'Tender Notice' document and a 'Page not found' error for another attachment further highlight poor data quality.

Illogical dates: Contract Start Date (2026-04-30) is the same as Submission Deadline (2026-04-30)
Irrelevant 'Tender Notice' document summary
Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions identifying an 'innovative and forward-looking partner' and 'ethically disposes of equipment,' which are positive but minor sustainability aspects. It does not explicitly incorporate broader green or social procurement criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of services required
Estimated value and contract duration are disclosed
CPV and NUTS codes are provided
Focus on innovation and ethical disposal mentioned

Concerns

Critical absence of evaluation criteria
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Irrelevant and missing tender documents
Lack of electronic submission support
Missing procedure codes

Recommendations

1. Publish clear and transparent evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and clarity.
2. Correct the contract start date to allow for a realistic award and commencement period.
3. Ensure all attached documents are relevant, accessible, and accurate, removing irrelevant entries and fixing broken links.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline