Skip to main content
Tenders

NEPO537 Payments, Appointeeships & Disbursements Services (PADS)

Open
Deadline
177 days left
September 19, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
018905-2026
Value
£7,200,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

September 12, 2026

Submission Deadline

September 19, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£7,200,000,000
Duration
49 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

NEPO, in collaboration with ESPO and YPO, is seeking to establish a new solution for the supply of Prepaid, Corporate, and Appointeeship payments. The solution will comprise four lots: Lot 1 - Prepaid Payments (secure, controlled fund disbursement via prepaid cards); Lot 2 - Corporate Payments (commercial procurement cards to streamline purchasing); Lot 3 - Appointeeship & Deputyship Accounts (manage direct payments and programmes with strong safeguarding); Lot 4 - Fund Disbursements (high-volume, secure, instant digital payments for grants, payroll, etc.).

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for payment services is generally well-structured with a clear description and substantial estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and document content, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear procedure and CPV code. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant omission.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the services required, divided into four distinct lots, is clear and well-articulated. The purpose and scope of each lot are understandable. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements leaves some ambiguity.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and duration is present. However, the critical omission of document content and specific evaluation criteria significantly reduces the completeness of the tender documentation provided.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is structured as a competitive flexible procedure, suggesting a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed, and the division into lots promotes competition. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of transparency regarding evaluation criteria.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date. However, the lack of explicit information on e-submission, document URLs, and financing details hinders practical assessment. The deadline may also be considered short for a tender of this magnitude.

No e-submission specified
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the contract start date aligning with the submission deadline, which is unusual but not inherently inconsistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which are common elements in modern tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of services across four lots
Substantial estimated value disclosed
Competitive flexible procedure indicated
Basic tender information is present

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
No explicit mention of sustainability or innovation

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Make full tender documentation accessible with clear URLs.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline