Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

The Supply of Buttons, Badges & Medal Ribbons

Open
Deadline
109 days left
July 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
017891-2026
Value
£47,040,000
Location
Lancashire, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

July 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

July 23, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 17, 2027

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£47,040,000
Duration
73 months
Location
Lancashire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Team Leidos is delivering logistics commodities and services transformation on behalf of the UK Ministry of Defence. This requirement is subject to Public Procurement Regulations. The Defence Clothing Team is considering the potential requirement for the Supply of Leather Gloves, consisting of 4 Lots: Lot 1: Embroidered Badges (£3.2M - £8.1M, 6 Years). Lot 2: Woven Badges & Medal Ribbons (£860K - £2.2M, 6 Years). Lot 3: Metal Badges (£9.3M - £23.3M, 6 Years). Lot 4: Buttons (£2.2M - £5.6M, 6 Years). As a framework agreement, there is no guarantee of business. Register on Jaggaer: https://leidossupply.app.jaggaer.com. Queries regarding the system should be directed to the support team. Queries regarding the tender should be directed through Jaggaer's messaging centre.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--All queries regarding the tender itself must be directed through Jaggaer's messaging centre.
--Queries regarding the Jaggaer system should be directed to the support team on the front page of the Jaggaer website under 'Need assistance?'.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by public procurement regulations.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must register on the eProcurement system, Jaggaer: https://leidossupply.app.jaggaer.com
--Bidders must express their interest on the Jaggaer system.
--Bidders must complete their bid on the Jaggaer system.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for buttons, badges, and medal ribbons is generally well-structured with clear financial information and a defined process. However, it lacks specific technical and financial requirements, and the absence of evaluation criteria is a notable concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to public procurement regulations by specifying an open procedure and providing a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the organization is clearly identified. The absence of disputes and regulatory compliance issues is positive. The mention of 'Public Procurement Regulations' indicates a commitment to legal frameworks.

Clarity80/100

The description of the requirement is clear, detailing the types of items and the context of the procurement. The use of an e-procurement system (Jaggaer) for registration, interest expression, and bid completion is clearly outlined. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The tender is divided into lots, with estimated values and durations specified for each. However, crucial details regarding technical capability and financial requirements are missing, impacting completeness.

Technical capability requirements not specified
Financial requirements not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all bidders and utilizes an e-procurement system, promoting accessibility. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The division into lots allows for broader participation.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates e-submission via Jaggaer, which is a standard and practical approach. A clear contract start date is provided. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the absence of detailed technical and financial requirements might pose practical challenges for bidders in preparing their submissions.

Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission deadline and contract start are logical and sequential. The CPV code and NUTS code are also present.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria within the procurement process.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear division into lots with specified values and durations
Mandatory e-submission via a dedicated platform (Jaggaer)
Open procedure with disclosed estimated value
Well-defined context and background information

Concerns

Absence of technical capability requirements
Absence of financial requirements
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed technical capability requirements for each lot.
2. Outline clear financial standing requirements for bidders.
3. Publish the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline