Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginUpgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login9 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
3 documents available with AI summaries
This OCDS record provides structured data about the Milton Keynes-Northampton 33/X33 Bus Route replacement service tender, detailing the procurement process and requirements.
This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the Milton Keynes City Council's tender for the 33/X33 Bus Route operator, including buyer information and initial tender specifics.
This tender seeks an operator for the Milton Keynes-Northampton 33/X33 Bus Route, offering an initial 1-year contract with two 12-month extension options, and requiring a valid operator license.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for bus route services demonstrates good basic information and electronic submission capabilities, but is significantly hampered by the absence of detailed quality evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds, impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness.
The tender defines the procedure type and assigns a correct CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds is a significant legal compliance issue. Missing procedure codes are a minor detail.
The service description is clear, and eligibility/submission requirements are understandable. However, a major concern is the lack of detailed evaluation criteria for the 'quality' component, despite the 50% weighting being specified. This ambiguity makes it difficult for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals.
Basic information like title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. Documents are available. However, critical information such as the liable person, mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed quality evaluation criteria are missing, significantly impacting completeness.
Full document access and electronic submission support contribute positively to fairness. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. However, the absence of detailed quality evaluation criteria severely impacts the objectivity and transparency of the evaluation process, potentially disadvantaging bidders.
Electronic submission is clearly supported with instructions, enhancing practicality. The contract start date and duration are well-defined, and estimated financing is available. This category performs well.
Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical. There are no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include a slight discrepancy in the estimated value (EUR vs. GBP equivalent in tender notice) and the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic not being fully elaborated for a single route. The AI summary also had an internal inconsistency regarding evaluation split, though the tender notice clarified it.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, leading to a low score in this category.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required