Legal Compliance100/100
The absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds is a significant legal compliance issue. While a 'Restricted' procedure implies pre-qualification, the lack of detail on this stage and the missing exclusion grounds could lead to legal challenges.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds provided.
Clarity40/100
While the material scope and Lot breakdown are clearly defined, the complete absence of tender documents, specifications, and explicit evaluation criteria severely compromises the clarity required for potential bidders.
•No documents attached
•No document content available
Completeness83/100
The tender information is highly incomplete, lacking essential documents, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed financial requirements, and crucial evaluation criteria, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive submission.
•No documents attached
•No document content available
Fairness60/100
The 'Restricted' procedure inherently limits competition. The requirement for 'Bespoke ECN Harnesses' based on a LUL-verified design, without access to design specifications, raises concerns about potential tailoring to a specific supplier. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria further compromises fairness.
•Potential for requirements to be tailored for a specific company (Bespoke ECN Harnesses without accessible design specifications)
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality40/100
The tender is highly impractical for potential bidders due to the complete absence of tender documents, detailed specifications (beyond the description), and explicit submission requirements, hindering their ability to formulate a compliant bid.
•No documents attached
•No document content available
Data Consistency100/100
The provided data is largely consistent in its description of the procurement scope and lots. However, the 'Submission requirements' section is incomplete, indicating a minor data consistency issue within the provided extract.
•Incomplete 'Submission requirements' section
Sustainability0/100
The tender completely lacks any explicit mention of sustainability, environmental, social, or innovation criteria, representing a missed opportunity for responsible and value-driven procurement.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria