Legal Compliance90/100
As a Preliminary Market Engagement Notice (PMEN), the tender correctly identifies its 'planning' status and 'None' for procedure type, aligning with pre-procurement activities. The CPV code is appropriate, and the timeline for market engagement is reasonable. It adheres to good practice for market sounding.
Clarity90/100
The description of the PMEN's purpose, objectives, and the information sought from the market is exceptionally clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements for participation in the market engagement are well-defined and understandable, appropriate for this preliminary stage.
Completeness60/100
While basic information, contact details, and the purpose are well-provided, there is a significant discrepancy in the estimated value, stated in EUR in one section and a different range in GBP in the description. Additionally, one of the four listed documents failed to download, impacting full access to information.
•Significant discrepancy in estimated value (EUR vs. GBP range)
•One tender document failed to download
Fairness65/100
The requirements for market engagement are generic and not tailored, promoting broad participation. However, the reliance on email for document requests and submissions, rather than a public e-procurement portal, creates a barrier to equal access and transparency. The value discrepancy also impacts transparency.
•Document access and submission via email rather than a public e-procurement portal
•Estimated value discrepancy impacts transparency
Practicality60/100
Electronic submission is supported via email, but the absence of a direct document URL and a dedicated e-procurement platform makes the process less efficient and practical for potential suppliers. The contact person and email are clearly provided.
•No direct document URL provided
•Reliance on email for document exchange instead of a dedicated e-procurement platform
Data Consistency40/100
The most critical issue is the major inconsistency in the estimated value, presented as a single EUR figure in one section and a different GBP range in another. This creates confusion and undermines the reliability of financial information. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.
•Major inconsistency in estimated value (EUR vs. GBP range)
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
Sustainability55/100
The notice explicitly focuses on understanding 'current market innovation,' which is a positive aspect. However, there is no mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or broader sustainability considerations, which are increasingly important in modern public procurement.
•No explicit mention of green procurement criteria
•No explicit mention of social aspects