Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Modernization of the port complex "Moje Boisko - Orlik 2012" at ul. Sportowa in Wola Uhruska

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 18, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00090005/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubelskie, Poland
Published
May 06, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 11, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 18, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Lubelskie
Type
Construction
56
Quality Score/100
Fair
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Modernization of the port complex "Moje Boisko - Orlik 2012" at ul. Sportowa in Wola Uhruska

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (11)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided information. Bidders should prepare a comprehensive offer including technical and financial proposals.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Not specified in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--Ability to obtain current land register excerpts for areas covered by the Agreement.
--Ability to perform necessary inventories.
--Ability to develop a map for design purposes.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided information. Bidders are generally expected to demonstrate financial stability adequate for a 36-month construction project.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de6256-4903-e001-4c32-fc0001f13787.pdf

This document is a notice regarding the tender for the modernization of the 'Moje Boisko - Orlik 2012' sports complex in Wola Uhruska, covering various construction and engineering works.

Zaê. Nr 3 do SWZ - Wzór formularza ofertowego .docxDOC
Zaê. Nr 3 do SWZ - Wzór formularza ofertowego... -- 54.3 KB

This document is the required offer form template for the modernization of the "Moje Boisko - Orlik 2012" sports complex in Wola Uhruska.

Zaê. Nr 4 do SWZ - Wzór oÿwiadczenia wykonawcy_wykonawcy wspólnie skêadanego na ...DOC
Zaê. Nr 4 do SWZ - Wzór oÿwiadczenia wykonawc... -- 29.2 KB

This document is a mandatory template for contractors' declarations, including those submitting jointly, required for the tender for the modernization of the 'My Pitch - Orlik 2012' sports complex.

SWZ+Załączniki.pdfPDF
SWZ+Załączniki.pdf

This document outlines the comprehensive tender conditions, submission requirements, and necessary attachments for the modernization of the "Moje Boisko - Orlik 2012" sports complex in Wola Uhruska.

Wyjaśnienia treści SWZ z dnia 12.02.2026.pdfPDF
Wyjaśnienia treści SWZ z dnia 12.02.2026.pdf

This document provides clarifications regarding the tender specifications for the modernization of the "Moje Boisko - Orlik 2012" sports complex in Wola Uhruska.

Zmiana ogłoszenia / Notice ChangePDF
notice_change_08de6ecb-f6a1-960f-056e-e50001a...

No summary available for this document.

Zmiana ogłoszenia / Notice ChangePDF
notice_change_08de6fbf-af63-9fe2-056e-e50001a...

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

56
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in clarity, fairness, and legal compliance, primarily due to a contradictory project title, missing evaluation criteria, and an undefined procedure type. While technical requirements are detailed, these critical omissions severely undermine the quality and transparency of the procurement process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The absence of a defined procedure type is a significant legal oversight, potentially rendering the tender non-compliant with national procurement laws. While CPV codes are present and no disputes are noted, the short implied submission period and undisclosed value further detract from full compliance.

Procedure type is not defined.
Implied submission period is short (less than 7 days from clarification date).
Clarity50/100

The primary concern is the fundamental contradiction in the project title ('kompleks portowy' meaning 'port complex' vs. 'Orlik 2012' referring to a sports complex), which creates significant ambiguity about the scope of work. The complete absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged, severely impacting clarity.

Contradictory project title ('port complex' vs. 'sports complex').
Missing evaluation criteria.
Completeness65/100

While basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of evaluation criteria and the estimated value. The lack of a specified liable person is a minor but present gap.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Estimated value not disclosed.
Fairness55/100

The lack of transparent evaluation criteria is a severe fairness issue, as it prevents objective comparison and creates an uneven playing field. The undisclosed value and potentially short submission period further hinder fair competition by limiting access and preparation time for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Estimated value not disclosed.
Practicality60/100

The conflicting information regarding electronic submission (E-Procurement characteristic vs. 'No e-submission' automated check) is a practical hurdle. The absence of a specific contract start date and detailed financing information can complicate planning for potential contractors.

Contradiction regarding electronic submission support.
No explicit contract start date.
Data Consistency60/100

The most significant inconsistency is the contradictory project title. Additionally, several key fields are unpopulated or explicitly marked as 'None' or 'Not disclosed,' indicating a lack of comprehensive data entry.

Contradictory project title ('port complex' vs. 'sports complex').
Procedure field empty.
Sustainability20/100

The tender completely lacks any explicit consideration for sustainability, green procurement practices, social clauses, or innovation, which is a missed opportunity for modern public procurement.

No green procurement aspects.
No social aspects.

Strengths

Detailed technical requirements for design and construction are provided.
E-Procurement characteristic is stated (implying electronic process).
All tender documents are listed and appear accessible.
Clear duration of the contract (36 months) is specified.
No reported disputes or suspensions.

Concerns

Critical: Contradictory project title ('port complex' vs. 'sports complex').
Critical: Missing evaluation criteria.
High: Undisclosed estimated value.
High: Missing procedure type.
Medium: Short implied submission period (less than 7 days).

Recommendations

1. Immediately issue a clarification to resolve the contradiction in the project title to ensure bidders understand the actual scope of work.
2. Publish clear, objective, and transparent evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and allow bidders to prepare competitive offers.
3. Provide the estimated contract value for transparency and specify the procurement procedure type to ensure legal compliance.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline