Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

CBC-1897-T-SM Construction Framework 2.0

Open
Deadline
45 days left
May 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
027386-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
April 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

May 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 31, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
48 months
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Central Bedfordshire Council Construction Framework

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
027386-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
027386-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
027386-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is in the planning stage, offering a good foundation with clear basic information and specified requirements. However, it lacks crucial details like estimated value and evaluation criteria, and the submission deadline may be tight.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in the planning stage, which inherently limits a full assessment of legal compliance. The CPV code is provided, and there are no reported disputes. The primary concern is the potential for a short submission deadline given the planning status.

Potential for a short submission deadline given the planning status.
Clarity80/100

The title, description, and AI-extracted requirements are clearly outlined, providing a good understanding of the tender's scope. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria hinders a complete understanding of how submissions will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as the title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is unavailable, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed.
No document content available.
Fairness85/100

The tender appears to have objective criteria for eligibility and technical capability, and it is divided into parts, which can promote competition. The lack of disclosed value and missing evaluation criteria are minor concerns for fairness at this planning stage.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits its practicality for potential bidders at this stage.

No e-submission specified.
Financing information not available.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information, which is a missed opportunity for sustainability integration.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title and reference number.
Organization and description provided.
CPV code specified.
AI-extracted requirements listed.
Contract duration and start date defined.

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed.
Missing evaluation criteria.
No document content available.
Potential for a short submission deadline.
No explicit sustainability focus.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Provide clear evaluation criteria for submissions.
3. Ensure sufficient time is allocated for the submission deadline.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline