Tenders

GLE Major Works Renewal Programme - Post Contract Professional Services

Open
Deadline
120 days left
June 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
011382-2026
Value
£1,800,000
Location
London, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

June 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

June 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Budget
£1,800,000
Duration
135 months
Location
London
Type
Other
63
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Post-contract Multidisciplinary Consultant Services to support the Golden Lane Estate Major Works Renewal Programme. Services include Contract Administration, Employer’s Agent, Quantity Surveying and Clerk of Works across RIBA Stages 4B–7, supporting major refurbishment works to nine listed residential blocks. Procurement via Competitive Flexible Procedure; award to Most Advantageous Tender.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 3 categories

Submission (3)
Compliance (9)
Technical (9)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submission by the deadline: 2026-07-01T00:00:00+01:00.
--Participation in a Competitive Flexible Procedure.
--Tender must be prepared to be evaluated based on the Most Advantageous Tender criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Ability to provide multidisciplinary consultant services.
--Ability to provide Contract Administration services.
--Ability to provide Employer’s Agent services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Demonstrated expertise in Contract Administration for post-contract phases.
--Demonstrated expertise as an Employer’s Agent for post-contract phases.
--Demonstrated expertise in Quantity Surveying for post-contract phases.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
011382-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record details the procurement of multidisciplinary consultant services, including Contract Administration, Quantity Surveying, and Clerk of Works, for the Golden Lane Estate's major refurbishment program across RIBA Stages 4B–7.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
011382-2026_ocds_release.json

This tender seeks multidisciplinary consultants for post-contract services, including Contract Administration, Employer’s Agent, Quantity Surveying, and Clerk of Works, to support the major refurbishment of nine listed residential blocks in London, requiring expertise across RIBA Stages 4B-7 and Higher-Risk Building Gateway processes.

Official PDF VersionPDF
011382-2026_official.pdf

This tender seeks multidisciplinary consultant services, including Contract Administration, Employer’s Agent, Quantity Surveying, and Clerk of Works, for the post-contract phase of a major refurbishment programme for nine listed residential blocks in London, valued at an estimated £1.5 million.

Tender NoticeHTM
011382-2026.html

UK tender document 'Tender Notice - GLE Major Works Renewal Programme - Post Contract ' in .HTML format.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides a clear and detailed project description but suffers from significant gaps in evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission, impacting transparency and practicality. Data inconsistencies, particularly regarding dates, also present a concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, with a clearly defined procedure type and appropriate CPV codes. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the reveal date is missing, and some procedural codes are not populated, representing minor administrative oversights.

Missing reveal date
Some procedural codes are not populated
Clarity60/100

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally clear, detailed, and unambiguous, covering services, RIBA stages, and specific works. The critical flaw is the explicit absence of detailed evaluation criteria, which significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how their proposals will be assessed, despite mentioning 'Most Advantageous Tender'.

No detailed evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location, is provided. Documents are attached and summarized. However, the crucial absence of detailed evaluation criteria makes the tender incomplete from a bidder's perspective. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

No detailed evaluation criteria specified
Liable Person field is empty
Fairness60/100

The lack of detailed evaluation criteria severely impacts the transparency and objectivity of the tender process, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and relevant proposals. The absence of an e-submission option also creates a barrier to equal access. While requirements are specific, they appear justified by the project's nature rather than being tailored to a specific company.

No detailed evaluation criteria specified
No electronic submission (e-submission) option
Practicality65/100

The absence of an electronic submission system is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. While the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, the lack of e-submission reduces the overall practicality of the tender process.

No electronic submission (e-submission) option
Data Consistency55/100

A major inconsistency is the identical submission deadline (2026-06-30 23:00:00) and contract start date (2026-06-30 23:00:00), which is highly illogical. There's also a slight discrepancy between the basic info and AI-extracted submission deadlines. Several key fields like 'Liable Person' and procedural codes are unpopulated, indicating incomplete data entry.

Submission deadline and contract start date are identical
Slight discrepancy in submission deadline between sources
Sustainability30/100

The tender documentation does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus criteria. While the project involves refurbishment, which can have inherent sustainability benefits, these are not framed as procurement objectives or evaluation factors.

No explicit sustainability criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description
Specific and comprehensive AI-extracted requirements
All basic tender information (title, reference, organization, value, duration) is provided
CPV codes are appropriately assigned
Documents are available and summarized

Concerns

Absence of detailed evaluation criteria for 'Most Advantageous Tender'
Lack of electronic submission option
Inconsistency between submission deadline and contract start date
No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Missing reveal date and some procedural codes

Recommendations

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Implement an electronic submission system to enhance accessibility and efficiency of the procurement process.
3. Review and correct all date inconsistencies, especially between the submission deadline and contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline