Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Electrical Testing and Associated Works

Open
Deadline
149 days left
August 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
009436-2026
Value
£46,200,000
Location
Outer London - East and North East, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

August 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

August 31, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£46,200,000
Duration
60 months
Location
Outer London - East and North East
Type
Restricted Procedure
64
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Procurement The Royal Borough of Greenwich wishes to procure two providers for undertaking the following works to council residential properties on a boroughwide basis. The successful supplier will be required to: • EICR and Remedial works to communal areas and dwellings • Electrical Call Out and Repairs Rewires and Sub Main Installations - Urgent and Emergency Works. • Lightning Protection System testing Maintenance and Repairs • Solar PV - Servicing, Testing and repairs • MVHR - Servicing, Testing and repairs To note that contracts will be issued in geographical based "Lots" to two service providers, but that the Council retains the option to issue works to either provider in either area should the operational need arise. Therefore, RBG will have two successful suppliers. Please note: Only one lot may be won by a single tenderer. If one tenderer comes first in both, they will only be awarded a single lot. The process that will be followed is the competitive flexible procedure (2 stage). This will include a Request to Participate stage (Stage 1) where suppliers will be shortlisted from PSQ questions. This will be Pass/fail only. The second stage will be the invitation to submit final tender stage (Stage 2), where the Most Advantageous Tender will be evaluated and awarded for each Lot. At this stage, the list of requirements above is indicative only and contains the broad categorisation of requirements rather than particulars. Suppliers should assume that the requirements actually required will be broadly within the scope of the requirements listed above but this may also include extensions to related or ancillary services. The actual scope of the requirements may be narrower than that set out above. Additional Information The estimated value set out in this notice is an estimate only and is in no way guaranteed or final. For the purposes of this notice, the total contract value is expressed as being inclusive of VAT. The associated tender documents for this opportunity contain more specific information. The dates referred to in this notice are also estimates only. The Authority has not conducted market engagement for this opportunity; however, RBG will still have regard for Section 12 of the act, Procurement objectives. The Authority is using the Proactis Rego platform to carry out this procurement. To obtain further information, please record your interest on Proactis Rego at: https://supplierlive.proactisp2p.com/Account/Login.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

23 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (8)
Technical (8)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submit a Request to Participate (RTP) in Stage 1.
--Complete and submit PSQ questions for shortlisting (Pass/fail evaluation).
--If shortlisted, submit a final tender in Stage 2.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the provided text but will be outlined in the PSQ (Pre-Qualification Questionnaire) or associated tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Must be capable of providing EICR (Electrical Installation Condition Report) and Remedial works to communal areas and dwellings.
--Must be capable of providing Electrical Call Out and Repairs, Rewires, and Sub Main Installations, including Urgent and Emergency Works.
--Must be capable of providing Lightning Protection System testing, Maintenance, and Repairs.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Demonstrate capability to undertake EICR and Remedial works for communal areas and dwellings.
--Demonstrate capability for Electrical Call Out and Repairs, Rewires, and Sub Main Installations, including urgent and emergency works.
--Demonstrate capability for Lightning Protection System testing, Maintenance, and Repairs.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance levels) are not detailed in the provided text but will be outlined in the PSQ or associated tender documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
009436-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides a planning notice for the Royal Borough of Greenwich's restricted procurement of two providers for electrical works, including EICR, repairs, rewires, lightning protection, and solar PV/MVHR servicing, to be awarded in geographical lots.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
009436-2026_ocds_release.json

The Royal Borough of Greenwich seeks two providers for comprehensive electrical works, including EICR, repairs, rewires, lightning protection, solar PV, and MVHR servicing for council residential properties, awarded via a two-stage competitive process in geographical lots.

Official PDF VersionPDF
009436-2026_official.pdf

The Royal Borough of Greenwich seeks two providers for electrical testing, repairs, and associated works on council residential properties, awarded through a two-stage competitive flexible procedure with contracts issued in geographical lots.

Tender NoticeHTM
009436-2026.html

This document is a contract details notice from Find a Tender, published by NHS England, announcing the award of a £249,190 contract to Living Potential Ltd for the delivery of the Aspiring Chief Executive programme cohort 7.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a two-stage competitive flexible procedure for electrical works, demonstrating good procedural clarity and reasonable timelines, but suffers from significant issues regarding document completeness, clarity of evaluation criteria, and data consistency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, aligning with UK procurement regulations. The submission deadline is very reasonable (over 6 months). However, the initial notice defers specific mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements to later documents, and the inclusion of an unrelated award notice (Document 1) is a compliance oversight.

Specific mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in the notice.
Inclusion of an unrelated award notice (Document 1).
Clarity60/100

The overall scope of works and the two-stage process are generally clear. However, the statement that requirements are 'indicative only' introduces ambiguity, and the explicit absence of specific evaluation criteria for the second stage (Most Advantageous Tender) is a major clarity deficiency.

Requirements are stated as 'indicative only', potentially leading to scope changes.
Specific evaluation criteria for Stage 2 (Most Advantageous Tender) are not detailed.
Completeness55/100

While basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are present, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of the actual detailed tender documents (PSQ, ITT) directly attached. The provided documents are summaries or irrelevant, and critical details like full evaluation criteria are missing.

Actual detailed tender documents (PSQ, ITT) are not directly provided.
Specific evaluation criteria are missing.
Fairness65/100

The tender benefits from a long submission deadline, disclosed value, and a lot structure that promotes competition (one lot per tenderer). However, the lack of specific evaluation criteria for Stage 2 significantly impacts transparency and objectivity, and full document access requires registration on an external platform.

Specific evaluation criteria for Stage 2 are not disclosed, impacting transparency.
Full tender documents are not directly accessible without platform registration.
Practicality80/100

The tender supports electronic submission via the Proactis Rego platform, and a direct URL is provided. Key information such as contract duration and an estimated start date are specified, enhancing practicality for potential bidders.

Contract start date is the same as the submission deadline, which is illogical and likely an estimate.
Data Consistency60/100

Many key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes. However, there is a direct inconsistency in the submission deadline between the basic information and the AI-extracted requirements. The contract start date is illogical, and the inclusion of an unrelated document (Document 1) severely undermines data consistency and reliability.

Inconsistent submission deadlines (Basic Info vs. AI-extracted requirements).
Contract start date is illogical (same as submission deadline).
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within its stated requirements or evaluation criteria. While the services benefit residential properties, there's no indication of broader sustainability objectives for suppliers.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social aspects or innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear definition of the two-stage competitive flexible procedure.
Reasonable submission deadline (long lead time for preparation).
Value disclosed and not classified.
Use of e-procurement platform (Proactis Rego) for submissions.
Division into geographical lots with a 'one lot per tenderer' rule promotes competition.

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria for Stage 2 (Most Advantageous Tender).
Full tender documents (PSQ/ITT) not directly attached; only summaries and an irrelevant document are provided.
Inconsistency in submission deadlines and illogical contract start date.
Inclusion of an unrelated award notice (Document 1).
Requirements are stated as 'indicative only', introducing ambiguity.

Recommendations

1. Publish the full PSQ and ITT documents directly or ensure the notice clearly directs to their location on the e-procurement platform.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria and their weightings for Stage 2 (Most Advantageous Tender).
3. Review and correct all date inconsistencies and ensure all attached documents are relevant to the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline