Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Preparation of a battery bank feasibility study

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307566
Value
€1,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the analysis100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject is the preparation of a feasibility study for a battery bank (energy storage) for the Vastseliina school building, in accordance with the technical specification (HD Annex 1) and the contracting authority's conditions. The purpose of the study is to determine the economic and technical feasibility of the battery bank, a suitable solution for ensuring backup power, and to provide recommendations for making an investment decision.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender prioritizes cost above all else, making aggressive pricing the primary driver for success. While technical capability is essential, the low estimated value suggests a focus on efficiency and streamlined delivery. Bidders should leverage their existing expertise and cost-effective delivery models to secure this contract.

Key Winning Messages

Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Feasibility Study for Vastseliina School.

Proven Expertise in Energy Storage Analysis, Delivered with Maximum Value.

Key Opportunities
Dominant focus on cost allows for aggressive pricing strategies.
Low estimated value may deter larger, more overhead-intensive competitors.
Clear deliverables (report, model, drawings, meeting) provide a defined scope for efficient service delivery.
Absence of specific green or social value requirements simplifies bid preparation, allowing focus on core technical and cost elements.
Key Challenges
Extremely low budget (1000 EUR) for a comprehensive feasibility study, potentially leading to unrealistic expectations or a race to the bottom on price.

Clearly define the scope and deliverables within the bid to manage expectations. Focus on efficient, streamlined processes and leverage existing templates/tools to minimize delivery costs. Ensure the bid price is sustainable for the required quality.

High competition due to the simplicity of the technical requirements and the cost-driven evaluation.

Aggressively price the bid to be the lowest. Highlight efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the bid narrative, even if not explicitly asked for.

Potential for bidders to underbid and compromise quality, leading to a poor study outcome for the client.

While pricing low, subtly emphasize the quality and thoroughness of the proposed methodology to assure the client that cost savings do not equate to compromised quality. Focus on efficient methodologies rather than cutting corners.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized consultancy or an individual expert with a proven track record in energy feasibility studies and a lean operational model. They should possess strong analytical skills and the ability to deliver high-quality reports efficiently, minimizing overheads.
Key Requirements
Preparation of a feasibility study for a battery storage system for Vastseliina school building.
Assessment of economic and technical feasibility.
Identification of suitable solutions and backup power options.
Submission of a complete PDF report, Excel model, conceptual drawings, and a presentation meeting.
Adherence to all conditions in base documents and contract draft.
Declaration confirming bid meets all conditions.
Explanation of business secrets.
Cost breakdown according to specified structure.
Key Discriminators
The lowest price submitted.
Demonstrated efficiency in delivering similar studies.
Clarity and conciseness of the proposed cost breakdown.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a requirement, consider a brief mention of how the proposed battery storage system could contribute to the school's long-term sustainability goals or educational opportunities for students, if applicable and easily integrated into the study's findings. This adds a subtle positive element without increasing bid cost.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of the analysis100.0%

Submit the absolute lowest viable price. Conduct a thorough cost analysis to ensure profitability while remaining highly competitive. Leverage existing tools, templates, and efficient workflows to minimize labor costs. Consider a lean team or an individual expert.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Bid
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible price that is still sustainable. Analyze internal costs meticulously and identify areas for efficiency gains to enable a highly competitive bid.

Directly maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion.
Ensure Comprehensive Deliverables in Price
CriticalMed effort

The bid price must explicitly cover all listed deliverables: complete PDF report, Excel model, conceptual drawings, and a presentation meeting. Ensure the cost breakdown reflects these components accurately to avoid perceived omissions.

Prevents disqualification and ensures all client expectations are met within the bid.
Streamline Study Methodology
HighMed effort

Develop a highly efficient and standardized methodology for conducting the feasibility study. Utilize templates, pre-existing data analysis tools, and a focused approach to minimize time and resources spent on each task.

Reduces internal costs, enabling a lower bid price while maintaining quality.
Manage Scope Expectations Clearly
HighLow effort

While not explicitly required to detail scope in the bid, ensure the internal understanding of the scope is precise. If any ambiguity exists, consider a brief clarification in the bid submission (if permitted) or be prepared to address it during the presentation to avoid scope creep that could erode profitability.

Protects profitability and ensures client satisfaction within the defined budget.
Highlight Efficiency and Speed (Subtly)
MediumLow effort

Although not a formal evaluation criterion, subtly emphasize in the bid narrative (if space allows) the bidder's ability to deliver high-quality analysis efficiently. This can be achieved through phrasing like 'our streamlined approach ensures timely and cost-effective delivery'.

Positions the bidder as a smart choice, even if cost is paramount.
Accurate Cost Breakdown
CriticalMed effort

Adhere strictly to the specified cost breakdown structure. Ensure all costs are clearly itemized and justifiable, demonstrating a transparent and well-managed approach to pricing.

Meets submission requirements and builds client confidence in the pricing.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous offer, emphasizing efficiency and a lean operational model that allows for superior cost savings without compromising essential deliverables. Highlight the ability to deliver precisely what is asked for, at the lowest possible price.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the cost of the analysis, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-03-31 12:00:00.
--The bid must adhere to all conditions set forth in the tender's base documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a declaration confirming their bid meets all conditions specified in the tender documents.
--Bidders must provide an explanation of their business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The service provider must be able to prepare a feasibility study for a battery storage system.
--The study should assess the economic and technical feasibility of a battery storage system for the Vastseliina school building.
--The study should identify suitable solutions and backup power options.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 1000.0 EUR.
--Bids must be submitted with a cost according to the specified structure.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307566_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.7 KB

Bidders must provide a clarification of their business secrets and confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents, including submitting the cost according to the provided structure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307566_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the cost of the analysis, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307566_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.8 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, intended for familiarization with the contracting authority's conditions, not for completion.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Hankedokument (HD).docx -- 31.3 KB

The Võru Municipality is seeking a service provider to prepare a feasibility study for a battery storage system, including guidance for proposal preparation.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
Lisa 1_Lähteülesanne (LÜ)_akupanga tasuvusana... -- 23.7 KB

The contracting authority seeks a service provider to prepare a feasibility study for a battery energy storage system for the Vastseliina school building, assessing its economic and technical viability, suitable solutions, and backup power capabilities.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2_Hankelepingu projekt_akupanga tasuvusa... -- 34.9 KB

This document is a draft of the service contract outlining the terms and conditions, rights, and obligations of the parties involved in preparing a feasibility study for a battery storage system.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a feasibility study on a battery storage system is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation based on price. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from a more detailed procurement process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender includes a clear CPV code, reasonable deadlines, and a disclosed estimated value. The procedure is defined, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The financing condition is somewhat vague, referring to a contract project.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service required (feasibility study for a battery storage system) is clear. Technical specifications are provided, and the evaluation criteria (primarily cost) are specified. Conditions for submission are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, and deadline is present. The estimated value and duration type are specified. However, the financing condition is not fully elaborated, and the reliance on a contract project for performance details could be more explicit.

Fairness85/100

The tender is open for electronic submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price). Full document access is implied through the listed documents. No specific tailoring to individual companies was identified.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing is stated as 'According to the contract project', which lacks specific detail. The duration is specified in days, aligning with the tender valid period.

Financing condition is vague.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent with the tender lifecycle.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not stated as EU-funded.

Lack of sustainability considerations.

Strengths

Clear technical description
Objective evaluation criteria (price)
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Well-defined CPV code

Concerns

Vague financing condition
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Contract start date not specified

Recommendations

1. Provide more specific details on financing terms.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria into the evaluation.
3. Specify the contract start date or a range.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline