Behöver du hjälp av en upphandlingsexpert? Se vår tjänst för anbudsförberedelse
Upphandlingar

Grapevine Variety Breeding Research

Stängd

Sista anbudsdag har passerat

Sista anbudsdag för denna upphandling har passerat och inga fler ansökningar accepteras. Informationen nedan sparas för referensändamål.

Bläddra bland aktiva upphandlingar
Sista anbudsdag
Utgånget
20 februari 2026
Avtalsdetaljer
Kategori
Tjänster
Referens
305862
Värde
€49,660
Plats
Estonia, Estland
Publicerad
6 februari 2026
CPV-kod
Utvärderingskriterier
Bid Cost45%
Bidder's vision and methodology45%
Inclusion of a horticultural science student10%
Tidsplan för projektet

Upphandling publicerad

6 februari 2026

Sista dag för frågor

13 februari 2026

Sista anbudsdag

20 februari 2026

Anbudsöppning

20 februari 2026

VinstsannolikhetPRO
🔒
Uppgradera till Professional
Se din uppskattade vinstsannolikhet baserat på historisk data.
Uppgradera till Professional →
SektorinsikterPRO
🔒
Lås upp sektorinsikter
Se genomsnittliga vinnande priser, konkurrensnivåer och marknadstrender.
Uppgradera till Professional →
Visa original
Budget
€49,660
Varaktighet
39 månader
Plats
Estonia
Typ
Tjänster
82
Kvalitetspoäng/100
Utmärkt
Marknadsjämförelse
Genomsnittligt vinnande pris
€40,919
Genomsnittligt antal anbud
1.9
Konkurrens
Låg
Vinnande små och medelstora företag
95%
495 analyserade upphandlingar

Ursprunglig beskrivning av upphandling

The aim of the research is to carry out the first stage of grapevine variety breeding in Estonia. The research contributes to activity 5.3 "Shaping variety breeding and propagation material policy" of the activity-based state budget food safety program 2025-2028.
Elektronisk inlämning

Kör riskanalys

Identifiera potentiella risker, inkonsekvenser och varningsflaggor i alla upphandlingsdokument. Få en detaljerad riskrapport med allvarlighetsgrader och rekommendationer för åtgärder.

Logga in

Vinnande strategi

Få en AI-driven vinnande strategi anpassad för denna upphandling. Inkluderar poäng för vinstsannolikhet, viktiga möjligheter och utmaningar, rekommenderade fokusområden för anbudet, insikter om konkurrenspositionering och handlingsbara rekommendationer för att maximera dina chanser.

Logga in

Konkurrenter

Uppgradera för att se vilka företag som sannolikt kommer att lämna anbud på denna upphandling, baserat på historisk upphandlingsdata.

Logga in

Krav och kvalifikationer

20 krav inom 5 kategorier

Inlämning (9)
Obligatorisk (2)
Regelefterlevnad (3)
Teknisk (5)
Ekonomisk (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--The bid must be submitted electronically.
--Parts considered business secrets must be clearly marked in the bid.
--Compliance of the bid with the conditions must be confirmed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder must not have grounds for exclusion as stipulated in RHS § 95 lg 1.
--The bidder must not be located in Russia or Belarus.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must prove horticultural science experience from the last 36 months with a list of significant works.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--The bid must comply with the conditions set out in the procurement documents and this compliance must be confirmed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--A work methodology must be submitted.
--An activity and timeline schedule must be submitted.
--A list of team members must be submitted.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid cost will be evaluated as a criterion (45% weighting).

Förhandsgranskning av krav

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Dokument

4 dokument tillgängliga med AI-sammanfattningar

VastavustingimusedPDF
305862_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, business secret declaration, confirmation of tender compliance, and mandates the submission of the bidder's work methodology, activity and timetable, team member list, and their previous experience.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305862_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.0 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the grapevine breeding research tender, focusing on the total cost (45%), the bidder's vision and methodology (45%), and the inclusion of a horticulture student in the team (10%).

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305862_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.9 KB

This document outlines exclusion grounds (e.g., absence of grounds under RHS § 95 lg 1, no location in Russia/Belarus) and qualification conditions, requiring bidders to demonstrate horticultural science experience from the last 36 months by submitting a list of significant works.

Hanke alusdokumendidPDF
Riigihanke_alusdokumendid.pdf -- 1.8 MB

This document outlines the conditions for the simplified procurement procedure for grapevine variety breeding research, detailing submission requirements, evaluation criteria (cost, methodology, student involvement), and the electronic submission process.

Förhandsgranskning av dokument

Registrera dig för att se dokumentöversikter och analyser

82
Utmärkt

Upphandlingskvalitetspoäng

This tender for grapevine variety breeding research is well-structured and transparent, demonstrating good clarity in its requirements and evaluation criteria, with strong adherence to legal and fairness principles.

Poängfördelning

Regelefterlevnad85/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (simplified), uses an appropriate CPV code, and explicitly references national legal exclusion grounds (RHS § 95 lg 1), including the Russia/Belarus restriction. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Tydlighet85/100

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-structured, covering all necessary aspects from exclusion to submission. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined with clear weightings.

•Exact region for research is unspecified, which could lead to minor ambiguity regarding operational location.
Fullständighet80/100

All essential information, including title, organization, reference, financial details, deadlines, and duration, is provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are thoroughly defined across the four tender documents.

•The exact geographical region for the research is not specified beyond the NUTS code for Estonia.
Rättvisa90/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, electronic submission, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, ensuring equal access for qualified bidders.

Praktisk genomförbarhet75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the funding source is identified. The duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and while documents are implied to be online, a direct URL is not explicitly given.

•Contract start date is not specified.
•Direct document URL is not explicitly provided (though implied by e-procurement).
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and sequential. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. A minor metadata inconsistency exists where 'Value Classified: Yes' is stated, but the estimated value is publicly disclosed.

•Minor metadata inconsistency: 'Value Classified: Yes' while the estimated value is publicly disclosed.
Hållbarhet60/100

The tender explicitly includes social criteria by requiring the inclusion of a horticultural science student, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks explicit green procurement or innovation-focused criteria and is not EU-funded.

•Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
•No specific innovation focus beyond general research methodology.

Styrkor

Clear and comprehensive requirements and evaluation criteria.
Strong legal compliance with national regulations and exclusion grounds.
Transparency through disclosed value and electronic submission.
Inclusion of social criteria (student involvement).
Detailed documentation available.

Potentiella problem

Exact geographical region for research is unspecified.
Contract start date is not explicitly provided.
Lack of explicit green procurement or innovation-focused criteria.
Minor metadata inconsistency regarding value classification.

Rekommendationer

1. Specify the exact geographical region or operational area for the research to enhance clarity.
2. Provide an estimated contract start date or a timeframe for contract commencement.
3. Consider integrating explicit green procurement or innovation criteria in future tenders, where applicable.

Förhandsgranskning av AI-poäng

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Fullständig analys av kvalitetsbetyg
Detaljerad uppdelning av delpoäng
Insikter om styrkor och svagheter
Strategiska rekommendationer

Inget kreditkort krävs • Konfiguration på 2 minuter

✨Vill du att vi hanterar denna upphandling?Vinn den här upphandlingen