Skip to main content
Želite da licitirate na javnim nabavkama? Pogledajte našu uslugu pripreme tendera TaaS
Tenderi

Izrada glavnog projekta za stanicu za otpad Märjamaa

Otvoreno
Rok
ostalo 3 dana
April 07, 2026
Detalji ugovora
Kategorija
Usluge
Referenca
306980
Vrednost
€45,000
Lokacija
Estonia, Estonija
Objavljeno
Mart 26, 2026
CPV šifra
Kriterijumi za ocenu
Total bid price100%
Vremenski okvir projekta

Objavljen tender

Mart 26, 2026

Rok za pitanja

Mart 31, 2026

Rok za podnošenje ponuda

April 07, 2026

Otvaranje ponuda

April 06, 2026

Verovatnoća pobedePRO
🔒
Nadogradite na Professional
Pogledajte svoju procenjenu verovatnoću pobede na osnovu istorijskih podataka.
Nadogradite na Profesionalni paket →
Informacije o naručiocuPRO
🔒
Otključajte informacije o naručiocu
Pogledajte obrasce potrošnje, preferirane procedure i još mnogo toga.
Nadogradite na Profesionalni paket →
Uvid u sektorPRO
🔒
Otključajte uvide u sektor
Pogledajte prosečne pobedničke cene, nivoe konkurencije i tržišne trendove.
Nadogradite na Profesionalni paket →
Budžet
€45,000
Trajanje
6 meseci
Lokacija
Estonia
Tip
Usluge
75
Rezultat kvaliteta/100
Dobro
Uporedna analiza tržišta
Prosečna pobednička cena
€71,415
Prosečan broj ponuda
4.8
Konkurencija
Srednja
Pobednici iz redova MSP
99%
2,006 analiziranih tendera

Originalni opis tendera

Cilj nabavke je pronalaženje projektanta za izgradnju stanice za otpad u opštini Märjamaa, selo Orgita, na parceli u vlasništvu Centra za otpad (KÜ 50301:001:0170).
Finansirano od strane EUElektronsko podnošenje

Pokreni analizu rizika

Identifikujte potencijalne rizike, neusklađenosti i upozorenja u svim tenderskim dokumentima. Dobijte detaljan izveštaj o rizicima sa nivoima ozbiljnosti i preporukama za ublažavanje.

Prijavite se

Strategija za pobedu

AI analiza zahteva, prilika i izazova ovog tendera. Dobijte strateške uvide za povećanje verovatnoće pobede.

60%
Procenjena verovatnoća pobedeUmereno podudaranje

This tender is a price-driven opportunity focused on the preparation of a main project for a waste station. Success hinges on a highly competitive bid price, supported by demonstrable experience in similar projects and qualified personnel. While social value and innovation are not explicit criteria, demonstrating efficiency and a clear understanding of the technical requirements will be crucial.

Ključne poruke za pobedu

The most cost-effective and technically sound solution for Märjamaa's waste station project.

Proven expertise in delivering essential infrastructure projects on time and within budget.

Ključne prilike
Sole reliance on price for evaluation offers a clear path to winning for a low-cost provider.
The defined scope (studies, approvals, permits, supervision) allows for precise cost estimation and resource allocation.
The relatively low estimated value suggests a project manageable by smaller, agile firms who can offer competitive pricing.
Ključni izazovi
Intense price competition due to the 100% price evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality. Explore efficient project delivery methodologies and leverage existing templates or software for faster design processes. Consider partnerships for specific tasks if it reduces overall cost.

Demonstrating sufficient prior experience in 'main projects' if the bidder's portfolio is diverse.

Clearly highlight and quantify relevant past projects that align with the scope of a waste station's main project. Emphasize the complexity and scale of these projects, even if they were not explicitly for waste management facilities, as long as they involved similar design and approval processes.

Profil idealnog ponuđača
A small to medium-sized architectural or engineering firm with a proven track record in designing waste management facilities or similar industrial infrastructure projects. They must possess a lean operational structure allowing for a highly competitive pricing strategy, coupled with a team of experienced engineers and architects capable of delivering the full scope of services efficiently.
Ključni zahtevi
Previous experience in preparing main projects.
Appropriately qualified key personnel.
Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds.
Total bid price (100% evaluation criterion).
Studies, approvals, permit applications, and author's supervision.
Ključni diskriminatori
A highly optimized and lean project delivery methodology that translates directly into a lower bid price.
A clear demonstration of efficiency and speed in obtaining necessary permits and approvals based on past experience.
Prilike za društvenu vrednost
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to local employment during the author's supervision phase or the use of local suppliers for any minor on-site support, if feasible and cost-neutral.
Fokusne oblasti ponude
Total bid price100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring all mandatory requirements are met. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource planning, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin. Leverage any economies of scale or pre-existing design elements.

Preporuke6
Aggressively Price the Bid
KritičnoVeliki napor

Given the 100% weight on price, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid that is still profitable and meets all requirements. Conduct a detailed cost analysis to identify all areas for optimization.

Directly determines the winning score.
Prove Relevant Project Experience
KritičnoSrednji napor

Clearly articulate and provide evidence of previous experience in preparing 'main projects', especially those involving industrial facilities, infrastructure, or complex permitting processes. Quantify the scope and complexity of these past projects.

Meets eligibility criteria and builds confidence in capability.
Highlight Qualified Key Personnel
KritičnoSrednji napor

Present CVs and qualifications of key personnel that demonstrate their expertise in architectural design, engineering, and navigating approval processes for similar projects. Emphasize their experience relevant to waste management infrastructure if possible.

Meets eligibility criteria and demonstrates technical competence.
Thoroughly Address Exclusion Grounds
VisokoMali napor

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are meticulously reviewed and confirmed as absent. Provide clear and unambiguous confirmations as required by the tender documents.

Prevents disqualification.
Clarify Trade Secret Explanations
VisokoMali napor

Prepare clear and concise explanations regarding any trade secrets, ensuring they do not hinder the evaluation of the bid or reveal proprietary information unnecessarily.

Meets submission requirements and avoids potential issues.
Optimize Submission Format and Cost Structure
SrednjeMali napor

Adhere strictly to the specified submission format and cost structure. Any deviation could lead to disqualification or a less favorable evaluation.

Ensures compliance and proper evaluation.
Konkurentsko pozicioniranje
Position the bid as the most efficient and cost-effective solution by highlighting streamlined processes and experienced personnel capable of delivering the project with minimal overhead. Emphasize a 'no-frills' approach that directly benefits the contracting authority through significant cost savings.

Konkurenti

Nadogradite da biste videli koje kompanije će se verovatno nadmetati na ovom tenderu, na osnovu istorijskih podataka o javnim nabavkama.

Prijavite se

Zahtevi i kvalifikacije

9 zahteva u 5 kategorija

Predaja (4)
Obavezno (1)
Usklađenost (2)
Tehnički (1)
Finansijski (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide explanations regarding trade secrets.
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of the terms.
--Bidders must agree to the submission format and cost structure.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must have previous experience in preparing main projects.
--Bidders must have appropriately qualified key personnel.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The project includes studies, approvals, permit applications, and author's supervision during construction.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Pregled zahteva

Registrujte se da biste videli potpune zahteve i analizu

Dokumenti

5 dokumenata dostupno sa AI sažecima

VastavustingimusedPDF
306980_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.5 KB

The bidder must provide explanations regarding trade secrets, confirm acceptance of terms, agree to the submission format and cost structure, and provide proof of equivalence if necessary.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306980_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The total bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives maximum points.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306980_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds, demonstrate prior experience in preparing main project designs, and possess qualified key personnel.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (Jäätmejaama põhip... -- 41.2 KB

The contracting authority seeks a designer to prepare the main project for the Märjamaa waste station, including studies, approvals, permit applications, and author supervision during construction.

hankelepingu olulised tingimusedDOC
Lisa 2 Töövõtulepingu projekt (Jäätmejaama põ... -- 35.3 KB

The essential terms of the procurement contract outline the object of the contract for the preparation of the main project and author's supervision for the Märjamaa waste station, the obligations of the parties, and the integral parts of the contract.

Pregled dokumenata

Registrujte se da biste videli sažetke i analizu dokumenata

75
Dobro

Rezultat kvaliteta tendera

This tender for the design of a waste station in Märjamaa is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of all tender documents.

Pregled rezultata

Zakonska usklađenost75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (LM) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible.

Jasnoća80/100

The description of the objective is clear, and the requirements for exclusion grounds, eligibility, and technical capabilities are well-documented. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated.

Potpunost70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the status '11' is unclear without context, and the availability of all 5 documents is implied but not explicitly confirmed as fully accessible or attached in a way that guarantees immediate download for all potential bidders.

Status code '11' requires clarification.
Pravičnost85/100

The tender is fair, with the value disclosed and objective criteria (lowest price). E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The requirements for previous experience and qualified personnel are standard and not overly tailored to specific companies.

Praktičnost65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract duration is specified. However, information regarding financing is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is not provided, which can impact planning for bidders.

Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Contract start date is not provided.
Konzistentnost podataka90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Održivost50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which is a positive aspect. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description or requirements.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Prednosti

Clear objective and scope of work.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.

Nedostaci

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Missing contract start date and detailed financing information.
Ambiguity of status code '11'.

Preporuke

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., waste management practices, use of sustainable materials) into the technical requirements or evaluation.
2. Provide the expected contract start date and more detailed information on financing sources.
3. Clarify the meaning of the status code '11' for better transparency.

Pregled AI ocene

Registrujte se da biste videli potpune zahteve i analizu

Potpuna analiza ocene kvaliteta
Detaljan pregled pod-ocena
Uvidi u prednosti i zabrinutosti
Strateške preporuke

Nije potrebna kreditna kartica • Podešavanje za 2 minuta

Nova usluga

Želite da prepustite nama ovaj tender?

Naši stručnjaci za javne nabavke pripremaju sve. Dokazano efikasno — Vi pregledate, odobrite i predate.

~1hVaše vreme
80%+80%+
$0Unapred
Pogledajte punu uporednu analizu
Bez TaaS-aSa TaaS-om
40-80 sati
Vreme pripreme
~1 sat
Vaše vreme
15-25%
Prosečan procenat uspešnosti
80%+
Procenat uspešnosti
Rizik od grešaka
Ručna provera
Stručna kontrola kvaliteta
Provera usaglašenosti
Sve radite Vi
Kompletna obrada
Sve radimo mi
Kompletna usluga
Dobijmo ovaj tender
Platite samo kada pobedite · Preko 400 kompanija nam veruje
Ili uradite sami

Dodaj u plan