Retour aux appels d'offres

Conception du bâtiment scolaire de Tarvastu

Ouvert
Date limite
2 jours restants
Mars 04, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
303526
Valeur
€120,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 13, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total cost of the bid100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 13, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 25, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 04, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 04, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€120,000
Durée
8 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€71,415
Offres moyennes
4.8
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
99%
2,006 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif de l'appel d'offres est d'élaborer un projet de construction au stade du projet principal du nouveau bâtiment scolaire de Tarvastu, y compris l'établissement d'un devis quantitatif et l'estimation des coûts de construction dans la portée spécifiée dans les documents d'appel d'offres (y compris l'élaboration d'un projet de démolition du bâtiment éducatif existant).
Achats écologiquesSoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

12 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (5)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (4)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender must include the total cost of the offer.
--A power of attorney must be submitted for joint tenderers.
--Business secrets must be marked in the tender according to the rules.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer must not be on the EU sanctions list or otherwise associated with sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must confirm compliance with all procurement documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tenderer must be capable of preparing the new construction project for Tarvastu school building according to the technical specification.
--The tenderer must be capable of performing design work using the general contracting method.
--The tenderer must be capable of performing design work including a demolition project, interior architecture, technical systems, and obtaining building permits.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., turnover, insurance) are mentioned in the summaries of the procurement documents.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

6 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
303526_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.0 KB

This document sets out tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, rules for marking business secrets, and confirmation of compliance with tender documents and EU sanctions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
303526_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that the total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points according to the provided formulas.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
303526_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.8 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's qualification conditions and expected responses from the undertaking, but it is for familiarization only and not for submission.

Juhised pakkujaleDOC
Juhised pakkujale.docx -- 27.4 KB

This document provides general instructions to tenderers for the Tarvastu school building design procurement, including contact details, funding sources, contract duration, and a list of all tender documents.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 54.5 KB

This technical description outlines the purpose, scope, and technical requirements for preparing the design project of the new Tarvastu school building, including existing building data.

Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx -- 48.5 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the scope and terms of work for the design of the Tarvastu school building, including the demolition project, interior architecture, technical systems, and obtaining building permits.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for the design of the Tarvastu school building is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and e-procurement. While it includes green procurement aspects, there are minor inconsistencies in procedure definition and a lack of explicit social or innovation criteria.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears to comply with national regulations, utilizing ESPD and referencing relevant acts. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are generally appropriate. However, the procedure type 'A' (likely Open Procedure) combined with 'Negotiation Allowed' creates a slight ambiguity regarding the exact procurement process.

Ambiguity in procedure type ('A') vs. 'Negotiation Allowed'
Clarté80/100

The project description, technical requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly stated. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and understandable. The only minor point affecting clarity is the slight ambiguity in the procedure type as noted in legal compliance.

Slight ambiguity in the exact procurement procedure type due to 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'A' type procedure.
Exhaustivité70/100

All basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. A good number of supporting documents are provided. However, the tender lacks explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., minimum turnover) which are common for projects of this scale. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is also contradictory to the disclosed estimated value.

Lack of explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., turnover)
Contradiction: 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' vs. 'Value Classified: Yes'
Équité85/100

The tender demonstrates good fairness with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, price-based evaluation criteria. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Aspect pratique65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality. The duration is clearly specified. However, a direct URL to the tender documents is not explicitly provided (though implied via the e-procurement portal), and an explicit contract start date is missing.

No explicit contract start date provided
Direct URL to tender documents not explicitly provided in the basic information
Cohérence des données90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. The primary inconsistency lies in the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicting the disclosed estimated value, and the procedure type vs. negotiation allowance.

Contradiction: 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' vs. 'Value Classified: Yes'
Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' and 'Negotiation Allowed'
Durabilité50/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific social criteria or an innovation focus, and it is not EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

No specific social criteria mentioned
No innovation focus mentioned

Points forts

Clear project description and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Comprehensive documentation provided (7 documents)
Full support for e-procurement and electronic submission
Explicit inclusion of Green Procurement characteristics
Reasonable submission deadline and transparent access to information

Préoccupations

Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (likely Open) and 'Negotiation Allowed'
Contradiction: 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' vs. 'Value Classified: Yes'
Lack of explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., turnover) for tenderers
Absence of specific social or innovation criteria
No explicit contract start date provided

Recommandations

1. Clarify the exact procurement procedure type and its compatibility with 'Negotiation Allowed' to avoid ambiguity.
2. Resolve the contradiction regarding the classified status of the estimated value.
3. Consider incorporating specific social and innovation criteria to enhance sustainability aspects beyond just 'green procurement'.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline