Atgal į konkursus

Tarvastu mokyklos pastato projektavimas

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 2 dienų
Kovas 04, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Paslaugos
Nuoroda
303526
Vertė
€120,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 13, 2026
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Total cost of the bid100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 13, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 25, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 04, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 04, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€120,000
Trukmė
8 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Paslaugos
75
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€71,415
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.8
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
99%
2,006 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Pirkimo tikslas – parengti naujo Tarvastu mokyklos pastato statybos projektą pagrindinio projekto stadijoje, įskaitant kiekių sąrašo sudarymą ir statybos išlaidų įvertinimą, kaip nurodyta pirkimo dokumentuose (įskaitant esamo mokymo pastato griovimo projekto parengimą).
Žaliasis pirkimasElektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

12 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (5)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (1)
Techninis (4)
Finansinis (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender must include the total cost of the offer.
--A power of attorney must be submitted for joint tenderers.
--Business secrets must be marked in the tender according to the rules.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer must not be on the EU sanctions list or otherwise associated with sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must confirm compliance with all procurement documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tenderer must be capable of preparing the new construction project for Tarvastu school building according to the technical specification.
--The tenderer must be capable of performing design work using the general contracting method.
--The tenderer must be capable of performing design work including a demolition project, interior architecture, technical systems, and obtaining building permits.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., turnover, insurance) are mentioned in the summaries of the procurement documents.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 6 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
303526_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.0 KB

This document sets out tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, rules for marking business secrets, and confirmation of compliance with tender documents and EU sanctions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
303526_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that the total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points according to the provided formulas.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
303526_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.8 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's qualification conditions and expected responses from the undertaking, but it is for familiarization only and not for submission.

Juhised pakkujaleDOC
Juhised pakkujale.docx -- 27.4 KB

This document provides general instructions to tenderers for the Tarvastu school building design procurement, including contact details, funding sources, contract duration, and a list of all tender documents.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 54.5 KB

This technical description outlines the purpose, scope, and technical requirements for preparing the design project of the new Tarvastu school building, including existing building data.

Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx -- 48.5 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the scope and terms of work for the design of the Tarvastu school building, including the demolition project, interior architecture, technical systems, and obtaining building permits.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

75
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for the design of the Tarvastu school building is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and e-procurement. While it includes green procurement aspects, there are minor inconsistencies in procedure definition and a lack of explicit social or innovation criteria.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender appears to comply with national regulations, utilizing ESPD and referencing relevant acts. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are generally appropriate. However, the procedure type 'A' (likely Open Procedure) combined with 'Negotiation Allowed' creates a slight ambiguity regarding the exact procurement process.

Ambiguity in procedure type ('A') vs. 'Negotiation Allowed'
Aiškumas80/100

The project description, technical requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly stated. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and understandable. The only minor point affecting clarity is the slight ambiguity in the procedure type as noted in legal compliance.

Slight ambiguity in the exact procurement procedure type due to 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'A' type procedure.
Užbaigtumas70/100

All basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. A good number of supporting documents are provided. However, the tender lacks explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., minimum turnover) which are common for projects of this scale. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is also contradictory to the disclosed estimated value.

Lack of explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., turnover)
Contradiction: 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' vs. 'Value Classified: Yes'
Sąžiningumas85/100

The tender demonstrates good fairness with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, price-based evaluation criteria. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Praktiškumas65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality. The duration is clearly specified. However, a direct URL to the tender documents is not explicitly provided (though implied via the e-procurement portal), and an explicit contract start date is missing.

No explicit contract start date provided
Direct URL to tender documents not explicitly provided in the basic information
Duomenų nuoseklumas90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. The primary inconsistency lies in the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicting the disclosed estimated value, and the procedure type vs. negotiation allowance.

Contradiction: 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' vs. 'Value Classified: Yes'
Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' and 'Negotiation Allowed'
Tvarumas50/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific social criteria or an innovation focus, and it is not EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

No specific social criteria mentioned
No innovation focus mentioned

Privalumai

Clear project description and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Comprehensive documentation provided (7 documents)
Full support for e-procurement and electronic submission
Explicit inclusion of Green Procurement characteristics
Reasonable submission deadline and transparent access to information

Problemos

Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (likely Open) and 'Negotiation Allowed'
Contradiction: 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' vs. 'Value Classified: Yes'
Lack of explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., turnover) for tenderers
Absence of specific social or innovation criteria
No explicit contract start date provided

Rekomendacijos

1. Clarify the exact procurement procedure type and its compatibility with 'Negotiation Allowed' to avoid ambiguity.
2. Resolve the contradiction regarding the classified status of the estimated value.
3. Consider incorporating specific social and innovation criteria to enhance sustainability aspects beyond just 'green procurement'.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“