Skip to main content
Retour aux appels d'offres

Protections pour incontinence

Ouvert
Date limite
13 jours restants
Avril 09, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Fournitures
Référence
306976
Valeur
€239,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Mars 11, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total bid cost for Lot 1 as presented in the Cost Form, cell M12.100%
Total bid cost for Lot 2 as presented in the Cost Form, cell M13.100%
Total bid cost for Lot 3 as presented in the Cost Form, cell M14.100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Mars 11, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Avril 02, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Avril 09, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Avril 09, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€239,000
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Fournitures
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€92,792
Offres moyennes
2.2
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
86%
3,220 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Achat de protections pour incontinence conformément à l'avis d'appel d'offres et aux documents de marché.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

18 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (6)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (3)
Technique (5)
Financier (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must submit the Hankepass.
--Bidders must submit the completed cost form.
--Bidders must submit the technical description.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide a Hankepass (self-declaration) as initial proof instead of certificates from authorities or third parties.
--Bidders must provide contact details.
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender document conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must submit a detailed technical description of the offered incontinence products.
--The technical description must include confirmations of compliance with sterility, CE marking, materials, and dimensions.
--Bidders must submit product samples.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must complete the cost form.
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion with a 100% weighting.
--The cost form requires filling in specified columns, indicating unit and package costs with precision up to two decimal places.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

7 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306976_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 31.2 KB

Bidders must submit compliance conditions, confirming acceptance of tender document terms, provide contact details, complete the cost form and technical specification, and submit product samples.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 25.8 KB

Bidders must provide a detailed technical description of the incontinence slings offered, including confirmations of compliance with sterility, CE marking, materials, and dimensions, and submit samples and a local representative.

Lisa 2 Maksumuse vormXLS
Lisa 2 Maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 14.9 KB

The bidder must submit the cost form, filling in the specified columns and indicating the unit and package cost with a precision of up to two decimal places, to evaluate bids based on the lowest estimated cost.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306976_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.9 KB

The tender document outlines the evaluation criteria for the incontinence sling tender, where the total bid price is the sole evaluation criterion with a 100% weight.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306976_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.8 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format.

Lisa 3 Raamlepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 Raamlepingu projekt.docx -- 47.1 KB

This framework agreement outlines the terms under which the supplier will provide incontinence products to Ida-Tallinna Central Hospital, emphasizing the supplier's professionalism and necessary experience.

RHAD üldosaDOC
RHAD üldosa.docx -- 39.5 KB

This general part outlines the tender documents for the incontinence sling procurement by Ida-Tallinna Central Hospital, including the tender notice, technical specification, cost form, and draft framework agreement, dividing the tender into three lots.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for incontinence slings is generally well-structured with clear technical and submission requirements. However, it lacks explicit mention of contract duration and sustainability aspects, and the sole reliance on price as an evaluation criterion might be a concern for quality-focused procurement.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The use of Hankepass (ESPD) is a standard practice. The absence of explicit contract duration is a minor omission.

Clarté80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-defined. Technical specifications and submission forms are specified. The evaluation criterion (price) is clearly stated, although its sole weighting could be a point of discussion.

Exhaustivité70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value and deadlines. However, the contract duration is not explicitly specified, which is a notable omission. The tender documents are listed and mostly accessible.

Missing contract duration
Équité85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. Access to documents is provided. The use of Hankepass (ESPD) is a standard and fair approach. The sole reliance on price as the evaluation criterion is objective but may not capture all aspects of value.

Aspect pratique65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a URL for the e-procurement platform is provided. Financing information is not detailed, and the contract start date is not specified. The duration of the contract is also missing, impacting practical planning.

Missing contract start date
Missing contract duration
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical. The AI-extracted requirements align with the provided document summaries.

Durabilité50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Points forts

Clear technical and submission requirements
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Use of Hankepass (ESPD) for eligibility
Well-defined CPV code and reference number

Préoccupations

Sole evaluation criterion is price
Missing contract duration
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommandations

1. Consider incorporating additional evaluation criteria beyond price to ensure best value.
2. Specify the contract duration and start date for better planning.
3. Integrate sustainability or social value criteria where applicable.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Nouveau service

Vous voulez qu'on s'occupe de cet appel d'offres ?

Nos experts en marchés publics préparent tout. Solution éprouvée — vous relisez, validez et soumettez.

~1hVotre temps uniquement
80%+80%+
$0D'avance
Voir la comparaison complète
Sans TaaSAvec TaaS
40–80 heures
Temps de préparation
~1 heure
Votre temps uniquement
15–25%
Taux de réussite moyen
80%+
Taux de réussite
Risque d'erreurs
Vérification manuelle
QA expert
Contrôle de conformité
Vous faites tout
Gérez tout vous-même
Nous faisons tout
Service clé en main
Gagnons cet appel d'offres !
Payez uniquement en cas de victoire — frais de succès uniquement · Utilisé par plus de 400 entreprises
Ou faites-le vous-même

Ajouter au Pipeline