Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login15 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
7 documents available with AI summaries
The contracting authority requires a prior guided site visit and confirmation of compliance with tender conditions, as well as clarification on trade secrets if applicable.
The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus evaluates bids for the Emalätte bridge reconstruction primarily based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.
The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the reconstruction of Emalätte bridge, requiring mandatory guided site visits for potential bidders.
The draft contract project defines the construction work conditions, quality requirements, and integral parts of the contract, including the contractor's bid and technical description.
The technical specification details the location, scope, environmental and safety requirements, and time restrictions for the Emalätte bridge reconstruction works.
The joint bidders' power of attorney and confirmation is a required document that proves the rights and obligations of joint bidder members and confirms their participation in the tender.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for the reconstruction of Emalätte bridge is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document formats.
The tender appears to comply with general procurement laws, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The procedure type (LM) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible. The status '11' typically indicates an ongoing or active tender.
The description of the reconstruction work is clear, and the location is well-defined. Key requirements such as the mandatory site visit and the use of Hankepass are specified. The evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting', which is a standard approach.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, some crucial documents (e.g., technical specifications, contract project) are referenced but not directly accessible or are in formats not easily analyzed by AI, impacting the completeness of the provided information for a full assessment.
The tender is fair, with full document access (though format limitations exist) and disclosed value. The criteria are objective (primarily cost). The use of e-procurement and electronic submission enhances fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.
E-submission is mandated, which is practical. The contract start date is specified. However, the reliance on specific file formats for key documents (.asice, .zip) might pose practical challenges for bidders if these are not standard or easily handled. The URL for opening place is provided.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated and consistent. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender valid period of 3 months aligns with the contract start date.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of specific sustainability focus within the tender requirements.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required