Atgal į konkursus

Emalätės tilto rekonstrukcija

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 14 dienų
Kovas 17, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Statyba
Nuoroda
306563
Vertė
€121,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 27, 2026
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Total bid cost100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 27, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 10, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 17, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 17, 2026

Sutarties pradžios data

Balandis 01, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€121,000
Trukmė
Nenurodyta
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Statyba
75
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€524,963
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.7
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
94%
5,932 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Šio pirkimo rezultatu bus užsakoma Emalätės tilto, esančio Taevaskojos pėsčiųjų tako, rekonstrukcija. Darbo atlikimo vieta: Taevaskojos kaimas, Põlvos seniūnija, Põlvos apskritis, Valstybinio miškų valdymo centro Kiidjärvės girininkijos 82 sklypas, kadastro kodas 61901:001:0124, žemės ūkio paskirties žemė 100%. Rekonstruojama lankytojų infrastruktūra/objektas yra statinių registre – ER kodas 221324222.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

15 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (5)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (4)
Techninis (3)
Finansinis (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Deadline for submission: 2026-03-17 12:00:00.
--The contracting authority has the right to change the expected contract award date.
--The contracting authority has the right to award the contract earlier than the expected date.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned, but general procurement law applies.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm compliance with conditions using the Hankepass (preliminary evidence).
--Bidders must confirm compliance with specified conditions.
--Bidders must provide clarification on business secrets if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must have prior guided familiarization with the object (Emalätte bridge).
--Technical specifications for the reconstruction of Emalätte bridge are detailed in LISA 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus_Emalätte sild.docx, including location, scope, environmental and safety requirements, and time limits.
--The contract project (Lepingu projekt.docx) defines construction work conditions and quality requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is valued at 121,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on total cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 7 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
306563_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.0 KB

The contracting authority requires a prior guided site visit and confirmation of compliance with tender conditions, as well as clarification on trade secrets if applicable.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306563_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.9 KB

The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus evaluates bids for the Emalätte bridge reconstruction primarily based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306563_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 39.7 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

HankedokumentDOC
HD.docx -- 58.1 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the reconstruction of Emalätte bridge, requiring mandatory guided site visits for potential bidders.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lepingu projekt.docx -- 37.7 KB

The draft contract project defines the construction work conditions, quality requirements, and integral parts of the contract, including the contractor's bid and technical description.

Lepingu lisa 1 - tehniline kirjeldusDOC
LISA 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus_Emalätte sild.do... -- 31.8 KB

The technical specification details the location, scope, environmental and safety requirements, and time restrictions for the Emalätte bridge reconstruction works.

Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitus.doc -- 34.5 KB

The joint bidders' power of attorney and confirmation is a required document that proves the rights and obligations of joint bidder members and confirms their participation in the tender.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

75
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for the reconstruction of Emalätte bridge is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document formats.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement laws, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The procedure type (LM) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible. The status '11' typically indicates an ongoing or active tender.

Aiškumas80/100

The description of the reconstruction work is clear, and the location is well-defined. Key requirements such as the mandatory site visit and the use of Hankepass are specified. The evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting', which is a standard approach.

Užbaigtumas70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, some crucial documents (e.g., technical specifications, contract project) are referenced but not directly accessible or are in formats not easily analyzed by AI, impacting the completeness of the provided information for a full assessment.

Some key documents are in formats not easily analyzed by AI (e.g., .asice, .zip).
Sąžiningumas85/100

The tender is fair, with full document access (though format limitations exist) and disclosed value. The criteria are objective (primarily cost). The use of e-procurement and electronic submission enhances fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktiškumas65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is practical. The contract start date is specified. However, the reliance on specific file formats for key documents (.asice, .zip) might pose practical challenges for bidders if these are not standard or easily handled. The URL for opening place is provided.

Key documents are in formats not easily handled by standard AI analysis tools, potentially impacting bidder preparation.
Duomenų nuoseklumas90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated and consistent. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender valid period of 3 months aligns with the contract start date.

Tvarumas50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of specific sustainability focus within the tender requirements.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Privalumai

Clear description of work and location
Mandatory site visit requirement
Electronic submission and e-procurement
Objective evaluation criteria (primarily cost)

Problemos

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Some key documents in non-standard or AI-unfriendly formats
Potential for contract award date changes

Rekomendacijos

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact mitigation, use of sustainable materials).
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in universally accessible and AI-analyzable formats.
3. Clarify the implications and potential frequency of contract award date changes.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“