United Kingdom57 days leftOpen

IT Support services

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

CONSORTIUM TRUST

LOCATION

East of England, United Kingdom

VALUE

£270,000

DEADLINE

March 31, 2026 at 16:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

72100000

REFERENCE

008290-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

IT Support Services Tender Document (RFP) 1. Introduction This Request for Proposal (RFP) invites qualified IT service providers to submit proposals for the provision of comprehensive IT Support Services for Consortium Trust. The objective is to appoint a reliable partner to ensure secure, efficient, and continuous IT operations in alignment with the Trust's statutory duties, governance framework, and responsibilities to its academies, pupils, and staff. 2. Organization Overview • Organisation Name: Consortium Trust • Legal Status: Multi-Academy Trust (MAT) • Governance Structure: Board of Trustees, Accounting Officer, and Executive Leadership Team • Industry / Purpose: Education • Location(s): Suffolk and Norfolk (see list at the end of this document) • Number of Settings: 12 Primary schools, 2 Special schools, 1 private nursery plus the Central Office • Current IT Environment Summary: Microsoft 365 and multiple cloud-based systems. Only two schools have servers which are being phased out. 3. Scope of Services The selected provider will be responsible for providing the following services in a manner that supports the Trust's governance requirements, Department for Education (DfE) accountability standards, and a multi-academy operating environment. Current provision consists of an annual bank of hours used remotely or onsite as required. 3.1 Helpdesk & User Support • Year round technical support • Year round remote and on-site support • Incident and service request management • Defined response and resolution times 3.2 Infrastructure & Systems Support • Server (physical/virtual) management (only two being phased out) • Network monitoring and maintenance • Backup and disaster recovery planning and support • Cloud services support (e.g., Microsoft 365) • Ad-hoc advice, planning and installation of capital projects (to be invoiced separately) • On-going support to integrate external applications 3.3 Endpoint & Device Management • Desktop, laptop, and mobile device support • Operating system and software installation • Patch management and updates 3.4 Cybersecurity Services • Antivirus and endpoint protection • Firewall and network security management • Security monitoring and incident response • User security awareness support 3.5 Maintenance & Preventive Services • Proactive monitoring • Scheduled maintenance • Performance optimization 4. Service Levels (SLAs) Providers must propose SLAs that reflect the Trust's operational criticality, governance oversight, safeguarding responsibilities, and duty of care across all academies, including but not limited to: • Response times by incident severity level • Resolution targets • Availability and uptime commitments • Escalation procedures, including reporting to Trust management where material service failures occur 4A. Safeguarding & KCSIE Compliance The Consortium Trust places the highest priority on safeguarding and the welfare of children. Providers must demonstrate full compliance with safeguarding legislation and statutory guidance applicable to UK education settings, including Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE). Providers are required to: • Confirm awareness of and compliance with the latest version of Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) and related statutory safeguarding guidance • Ensure all staff assigned to Trust settings (including on-site and remote support staff) have appropriate DBS checks in place, proportionate to their role and access level. Staff working onsite at Riverwalk and Warren schools will need DBS checks to Enhanced Adult level due to the age of some pupils in these sites. • Maintain clear policies and procedures for safeguarding, child protection, and safer working practices • Ensure staff receive regular safeguarding awareness training, including recognising and reporting safeguarding concerns • Immediately report any safeguarding concern, allegation, or incident to the Trust's designated safeguarding leads in accordance with Trust procedures • Ensure IT systems, monitoring tools, and content filtering solutions support the Trust's safeguarding obligations, including: o Appropriate content filtering and monitoring in line with KCSIE expectations o Secure management of user access, permissions, and audit logs o Protection of pupil data and online safety Failure to meet safeguarding and KCSIE compliance requirements may result in disqualification from the tender process or termination of contract. A letter of assurance will be required at the start of the contract and updated annually. 5. Provider Qualifications Providers should provide details of: • Company profile and years in operation • Relevant certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, ITIL, Microsoft Partner) • Experience with similar organizations • Key personnel and roles • Client references (minimum 2) 6. Proposal Requirements Proposals should include: 1. Executive summary 2. Understanding of requirements 3. Detailed service delivery approach 4. SLA proposal 5. Security and compliance approach 6. Pricing structure 7. Assumptions and exclusions 8. Value-added services 7. Pricing & Commercials Provide a clear pricing model, including: • Monthly/annual support fees • Per-user or per-device costs • On-site support rates (if applicable) • One-time setup or transition costs 8. Contract Terms • Contract duration: 3 years subject to approval by the Trust's Board of Trustees commencing on 1st September 2026 • Renewal terms, subject to performance review and trustee approval • Termination clauses, including termination for breach of fiduciary or confidentiality obligations • Confidentiality, data protection, and compliance with applicable UK education regulations, safeguarding requirements, and UK GDPR • Intellectual property, ensuring the Trust retains ownership of its data and systems 9. Evaluation Criteria Proposals will be evaluated based on: • Technical capability and approach • Relevant experience • SLA robustness • Cost-effectiveness • References and past performance • Shortlisted providers may be invited to interview 10. RFP Timeline • RFP Issue Date: 30th January 2026 • Clarification Deadline: Midday 27th February 2026 • Proposal Submission Deadline: 5pm on 31st March 2026 • Evaluation Period: 1st to 30th April 2026 • Interviews (if required) : week commencing 20th April 2026 • Approval by Trustees: 14th May 2026 • Award Notification: 15th May 2026 11. Submission Instructions Proposals must be submitted: • Format: PDF / Word • Method: email to l.jones@consortiumtrust.org.uk • Contact Person: Lisa Jones - Director of Finance and Resources. 01473 355537 Late submissions will not be considered. 12. Terms & Conditions • Consortium Trust, acting through its duly authorised Trustees, Accounting Officer, or delegated officers, reserves the right to accept or reject any proposal, in whole or in part. • The Trust may request additional information or clarification from providers as part of its due diligence process. • Costs incurred in proposal preparation are the provider's responsibility. • This RFP does not constitute a contract, fiduciary relationship, or commitment on the part of the Trust until formally approved and executed in accordance with the Trust's governance procedures. ________________________________________ Authorized by: Name: Lisa Jones Title: Director of Finance and Resources Date: __________________________ Settings included: • Consortium Trust Office, Helmingham School House, School Lane, Helmingham. IP14 6EX • Glebeland Primary School, Beccles Road, Toft Monks. Beccles, NR34 0EW • Barnby & North Cove Primary School, The Street, Barnby, Beccles, NR34 7QB • St Edmund's Primary School (Hoxne), Heckfield Green, Hoxne, IP21 5AD • Mendham Primary School, Mendham, IP20 0NJ • Henley Primary School, Ashbocking Road, Henley, IP6 0QX • Helmingham Primary School, School Road, Helmingham, IP14 6EX • Rendlesham Primary School, Sycamore Drive, Rendlesham, IP12 2GF • Winterton Primary School, Black Street, Winterton-on-Sea, NR29 4AP • Middleton Primary School, 1 Rectory Road, Middleton, IP17 3NR • Southwold Primary School, Cumberland Road, Southwold, IP18 6JP • Yoxford & Peasenhall Primary School, High Street, Yoxford, IP17 3EU • Kirkley Nursery, Kirkley Children's Centre, Kirkley Street, Lowestoft, NR33 0LU • Reedham Primary School, School Hill, Reedham, Norwich. NR13 3TJ • Riverwalk School, Riverwalk Campus, Mayfield Road, Bury St Edmunds. IP33 2PD • Warren School, Clarkes Lane, Lowestoft. NR33 8HT
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Failure to meet safeguarding and KCSIE compliance requirements will result in disqualification from the tender process or termination of contract.
  • Late submissions will not be considered.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Providers must be qualified IT service providers.
  • Providers must demonstrate full compliance with safeguarding legislation and statutory guidance applicable to UK education settings, including Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE).
  • Providers must confirm awareness of and compliance with the latest version of Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) and related statutory safeguarding guidance.
  • Providers must ensure all staff assigned to Trust settings (including on-site and remote support staff) have appropriate DBS checks in place, proportionate to their role and access level.
  • Providers must ensure staff working onsite at Riverwalk and Warren schools have DBS checks to Enhanced Adult level.
  • Providers must maintain clear policies and procedures for safeguarding, child protection, and safer working practices.
  • Providers must ensure staff receive regular safeguarding awareness training, including recognising and reporting safeguarding concerns.
  • Providers must immediately report any safeguarding concern, allegation, or incident to the Trust's designated safeguarding leads in accordance with Trust procedures.
  • Providers must ensure IT systems, monitoring tools, and content filtering solutions support the Trust's safeguarding obligations, including appropriate content filtering and monitoring in line with KCSIE expectations, secure management of user access, permissions, and audit logs, and protection of pupil data and online safety.
  • A letter of assurance regarding safeguarding and KCSIE compliance will be required at the start of the contract and updated annually.
  • Providers must comply with confidentiality, data protection, applicable UK education regulations, safeguarding requirements, and UK GDPR.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Ability to provide comprehensive IT Support Services for Consortium Trust.
  • Ability to ensure secure, efficient, and continuous IT operations in alignment with the Trust's statutory duties, governance framework, and responsibilities to its academies, pupils, and staff.
  • Ability to provide services that support the Trust's governance requirements, Department for Education (DfE) accountability standards, and a multi-academy operating environment.
  • Ability to provide year-round technical support (remote and on-site).
  • Ability to manage incidents and service requests with defined response and resolution times.
  • Ability to manage servers (physical/virtual) for the two remaining sites being phased out.
  • Ability to monitor and maintain networks.
  • Ability to plan and support backup and disaster recovery.
  • Ability to support cloud services (e.g., Microsoft 365).
  • Ability to provide ad-hoc advice, planning, and installation of capital projects.
  • Ability to provide ongoing support to integrate external applications.
  • Ability to support desktop, laptop, and mobile devices.
  • Ability to perform operating system and software installation.
  • Ability to manage patch management and updates.
  • Ability to provide antivirus and endpoint protection.
  • Ability to manage firewalls and network security.
  • Ability to provide security monitoring and incident response.
  • Ability to support user security awareness.
  • Ability to provide proactive monitoring.
  • Ability to perform scheduled maintenance.
  • Ability to perform performance optimization.
  • Providers must propose Service Level Agreements (SLAs) that reflect operational criticality, governance oversight, safeguarding responsibilities, and duty of care, including response times by incident severity, resolution targets, availability/uptime commitments, and escalation procedures.
  • Providers must provide details of their company profile and years in operation.
  • Providers must provide details of relevant certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, ITIL, Microsoft Partner).
  • Providers must provide details of experience with similar organizations.
  • Providers must provide details of key personnel and roles.
  • Providers must provide a minimum of 2 client references.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Providers must provide a clear pricing model.
  • Pricing model must include monthly/annual support fees.
  • Pricing model must include per-user or per-device costs.
  • Pricing model must include on-site support rates (if applicable).
  • Pricing model must include one-time setup or transition costs.
  • Ad-hoc advice, planning, and installation of capital projects will be invoiced separately.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Proposals must be submitted by 5pm on 31st March 2026.
  • Proposals must be submitted in PDF or Word format.
  • Proposals must be submitted via email to l.jones@consortiumtrust.org.uk.
  • Proposals must include an Executive summary.
  • Proposals must include an Understanding of requirements.
  • Proposals must include a Detailed service delivery approach.
  • Proposals must include an SLA proposal.
  • Proposals must include a Security and compliance approach.
  • Proposals must include a Pricing structure.
  • Proposals must include Assumptions and exclusions.
  • Proposals must include Value-added services.
  • Providers may submit questions for clarification by Midday 27th February 2026.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

HTM
Attachment A-11160
OtherA-11160.html
Summary:
This document is a web page snippet from the Find a Tender portal, primarily discussing cookie settings and briefly mentioning a tender for snacks and soft drinks for York College.
HTM
Lot L-1
OtherL-1.html
Summary:
Download failed - no summary available
DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data008290-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record details a Request for Proposal (RFP) from Consortium Trust for comprehensive IT Support Services across its 15 schools and central office in Suffolk and Norfolk, requiring providers to demonstrate strong safeguarding compliance, including KCSIE.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data008290-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This OCDS data package provides structured information about the Consortium Trust's Request for Proposal (RFP) for comprehensive IT Support Services, detailing the buyer, contact person, and tender initiation.
PDF
Official PDF Version
Administrative Documents008290-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This document is an award notice detailing the direct award of a contract by Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust to Ruth Lee Limited for the supply of training manikins, valued at £10,086, with a contract period from February 2026 to January 2027.
HTM
Tender Notice
Notice008290-2026.html
Summary:
Download failed - no summary available

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

56
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a clear scope of services with a strong social aspect, but suffers from critical deficiencies such as missing evaluation criteria and inaccessible tender documents, significantly undermining transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The procedure type is clear and the value is disclosed. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, an imprecise CPV code, and the critical issue of missing or irrelevant tender documents are significant legal compliance shortcomings. The missing reveal date also impacts transparency.

No evaluation criteria specified
CPV code (72100000) is too narrow for comprehensive IT support
Clarity70/100

The description of the scope of services and technical requirements is exceptionally clear and detailed, particularly regarding safeguarding. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly reduces the clarity of the procurement process for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness40/100

While basic information like title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are present, the tender is critically incomplete due to the widespread failure to access actual tender documents, an incomplete 'Proposal Requirements' section, and the absence of evaluation criteria. The stated 'Divided into Parts' characteristic lacks detail.

Critical tender documents are missing or irrelevant
Proposal Requirements section is incomplete
Fairness45/100

The requirements themselves do not appear tailored to a specific company. However, the lack of full document access, the complete absence of evaluation criteria, and the reliance on email for submission (rather than an e-procurement platform) severely compromise the fairness and equal opportunity for bidders.

No full document access due to missing/irrelevant documents
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality55/100

Key practical information such as contract start date, duration, and estimated value are provided. However, the critical failure of many listed documents to download makes it highly impractical for bidders to prepare a comprehensive proposal. Email submission, while supported, is less practical than a dedicated e-procurement system.

Many listed documents failed to download, making information inaccessible
Submission via email is less practical than an e-procurement platform
Data Consistency75/100

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, some key fields like 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code' are empty. The 'Proposal Requirements' section is cut off, and the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic is not elaborated, indicating minor data gaps and inconsistencies.

Empty fields for 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', 'Procedure Code'
Incomplete 'Proposal Requirements' section
Sustainability70/100

This tender demonstrates a very strong focus on social sustainability through its explicit and detailed requirements for safeguarding and KCSIE compliance, which is highly relevant and critical for an education trust. However, there is no mention of green procurement or innovation focus.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear and detailed scope of services and technical requirements.
Strong emphasis on safeguarding and KCSIE compliance, crucial for an education setting.
Estimated value, contract duration, and start date are clearly specified.
Requirements for provider qualifications and proposal content are well-defined (though proposal content is cut off).
Open procedure type and value disclosure promote transparency.

Concerns

Critical lack of accessible tender documents; many failed to download or are irrelevant.
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria, severely impacting transparency and fairness.
Incomplete 'Proposal Requirements' section in the provided text.
Submission via email rather than a dedicated e-procurement platform.
CPV code (Hardware consultancy services) appears too narrow for comprehensive IT support.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all relevant tender documents are correctly attached, accessible, and free from errors or irrelevant content.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria and their weighting to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
3. Complete the 'Proposal Requirements' section and provide full details for all listed items.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
C
Tender Quality Score
56/ 100 · Fair

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes