De-Polluted Scrap Car Provision and Collection

This preliminary market engagement notice provides clear technical requirements and a strong environmental focus, but suffers from significant omissions such as defined evaluation criteria, a formal procedure type, and the lack of e-submission, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender is in a 'planning' status, seeking expressions of interest, which explains some missing elements. However, the absence of a defined procedure type and the missing reveal date are notable deficiencies for any procurement notice, even preliminary ones. The CPV code is appropriate, and no disputes are reported.

The description of the required vehicles, their conditions, and the delivery/collection services is very clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements accurately reflect the stated needs. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue, preventing potential suppliers from understanding how their submissions will be assessed.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, description, financial details, timeline, and location are provided. All listed documents are available. Nevertheless, the critical omission of evaluation criteria, the undefined procedure type, and the empty 'Liable Person' field represent significant gaps in completeness, especially for a notice leading to a formal tender.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as suppliers cannot objectively prepare their submissions. The absence of e-submission also creates an unequal playing field and increases administrative burden. The missing reveal date prevents confirmation of fair preparation time from publication.

Key practical details like contract start date, duration, and estimated value are clearly stated. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback, potentially hindering participation and increasing administrative overhead for both the authority and suppliers. The absence of a direct document URL is a minor inconvenience.

The dates provided are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the structured data is incomplete, with key fields such as 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' left unpopulated. The absence of evaluation criteria also points to a lack of comprehensive data.

The tender demonstrates a strong commitment to environmental sustainability by explicitly requiring de-polluted vehicles compliant with the End of Life Vehicle Regulations (2000/53/EC) and adherence to relevant environmental legislation. This is a clear green procurement aspect. However, there are no explicit social or innovation criteria mentioned, nor is it indicated as EU funded.