Transcription Services

This is a preliminary market engagement notice that clearly defines the required services but lacks many elements crucial for a formal tender, such as evaluation criteria and e-submission capability.

As a planning notice, full legal compliance for a formal tender is not expected. However, the absence of a defined procedure type and formal legal grounds (even if preliminary) lowers the score. The CPV code is correctly assigned, and there are no disputes.

The service description and technical requirements are very clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue, as it provides no guidance for potential suppliers on future assessment.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration is provided. However, the absence of a formal procedure type, liable person, and especially evaluation criteria makes it incomplete as a precursor to a full tender.

The technical requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the lack of any evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission capability are significant concerns for transparency and equal access in the overall procurement process.

The lack of electronic submission support is a major practical drawback in modern procurement. While contract start date and duration are specified, the submission method significantly impacts ease of participation.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The missing 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' are minor inconsistencies, understandable for a planning notice.

There is a complete absence of any mention or integration of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the tender information.