BT354- Servicing and Maintenance - Automatic Air Quality Monitoring Station Sites

This tender is generally well-structured with clear core requirements and evaluation criteria, but it suffers from significant practical limitations due to the lack of e-submission and a notable absence of sustainability considerations.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and the submission period is reasonable. While a 'reveal date' is missing from the provided data, the overall structure appears compliant with standard procurement principles for a below-threshold contract.

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial aspects, and submission are well-defined. The 70% quality / 30% price award criteria are explicitly stated, providing good transparency on evaluation weighting.

Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, value, duration, and location, is provided. Key requirements and evaluation criteria weighting are defined. However, detailed sub-criteria for the 70% quality evaluation are not present in the summary, which would be expected in full tender documentation.

Document access is indicated, the value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the absence of electronic submission (as flagged by automated checks) significantly impacts fairness by potentially creating barriers for some bidders and limiting equal access.

The lack of electronic submission is a major practical drawback, increasing administrative burden for bidders. While the contract start date and duration are clear, the absence of e-submission makes the process less efficient and modern.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are minor inconsistencies such as missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', an empty 'Liable Person' field, and a contradiction where 'Value Classified: Yes' is stated despite the estimated value being disclosed.

The tender shows no explicit focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This represents a significant missed opportunity for incorporating broader public value.