Cleaning of stairwells in buildings managed by SIA “DOBELES NAMSAIMNIEKS”

This tender for stairwell cleaning services is generally well-structured with clear requirements, but it lacks transparency regarding the estimated contract value and has conflicting information about evaluation criteria. While electronic submission is supported, sustainability aspects are not explicitly addressed.

The tender defines an open procedure, uses a relevant CPV code, and provides a reasonable submission period. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned, indicating compliance with standard procurement principles. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value, while not always a legal breach, reduces transparency, and the 'Restricted document access' flag, if true, would be a significant legal concern.

The service description is clear and unambiguous, and AI-extracted requirements are well-defined across eligibility, technical, financial, and submission categories. Performance conditions are linked to provided technical specifications and a draft contract. A notable concern is the conflicting information regarding the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration are fully provided. All listed documents are summarized, indicating their availability. The primary gap in completeness is the undisclosed estimated contract value, which is crucial information for potential bidders.

The tender supports e-procurement and provides a reasonable deadline, promoting equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value significantly impacts fairness by limiting transparency for bidders. The conflicting information about evaluation criteria also raises concerns about their objectivity and transparency.

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the absence of a known contract start date and the undisclosed estimated value (financing information) reduce the practicality for bidders in terms of planning and financial assessment.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The main inconsistency lies in the contradictory information regarding the presence and clarity of evaluation criteria, as flagged by automated checks versus document summaries.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.