UEC Middle House Refurbishment (Works)

This tender presents significant gaps in critical information, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and full document access, which severely impacts fairness and clarity. While basic information is present, the lack of detail in key areas and absence of sustainability considerations are notable concerns.

Legal compliance is moderately impacted by the missing reveal date, which prevents assessment of reasonable preparation time, and the lack of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds. Procedure codes are also missing.

Clarity is significantly compromised by the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. The lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds also reduces clarity.

The tender is incomplete due to the missing evaluation criteria and the failure to download the 'Official PDF Version', which likely contains crucial details. Specific mandatory exclusion grounds are also not detailed.

Fairness is severely undermined by the absence of evaluation criteria, preventing objective assessment of bids. The failed download of a key document and the missing reveal date (impacting preparation time assessment) further reduce transparency and equal access.

While electronic submission via Atamis is supported, the inability to download the 'Official PDF Version' poses a significant practical barrier for potential bidders to access full tender details.

Data consistency is generally good for the provided information, with logical dates and active status. However, some key fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are unpopulated, and the reveal date is missing.

The tender shows very poor performance in sustainability, with no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.