Alarm Receiving Centre (ARC)

This tender for Alarm Receiving Centre services is well-defined with clear requirements and a strong emphasis on social value, ensuring a transparent and fair process for bidders. While generally robust, minor improvements could be made in fully detailing legal exclusion grounds and broader sustainability aspects.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and correctly assigns the CPV code. While the submission deadline provides sufficient time, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary is a notable concern. The missing reveal date is a minor procedural gap.

The description of the required services is clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial aspects, and submission are well-documented and understandable. Evaluation criteria, including their weightings (technical 50%, price 40%, social value 10%), are explicitly specified.

All essential basic information, such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and location (NUTS code), is provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are clearly defined. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside the disclosed value is a minor inconsistency, and the reveal date is not explicitly stated.

The tender follows an open procedure, discloses the estimated value, and provides objective and transparent evaluation criteria. Electronic submission is supported, promoting equal access for all bidders. The requirements, such as being an 'established Alarm Receiving Centre,' are specific but appear functional and not tailored to a particular company.

Electronic submission is fully supported, and a direct URL to the tender portal is provided for accessing documents. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While the estimated value is known, more detailed financing information beyond the value is not explicitly available in the summary.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable tender status. Dates (submission deadline, contract start) are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include empty 'Type (Code: )' and 'Liable Person' fields, and the 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed value.

The tender explicitly incorporates social value, accounting for 10% of the evaluation, which is a strong positive for sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement aspects or a focus on innovation within the provided information.