Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and no disputes or suspensions are noted. The submission deadline provides ample time for preparation (over 9 months). However, the provided information lacks explicit procedure codes and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, which are minor gaps in a summary.
•Missing procedure codes for 'Restricted' and 'Competitive flexible procedure'
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly detailed in the provided tender information
Clarity60/100
The project description and AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally clear, detailed, and unambiguous, outlining the vision and objectives effectively. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it unclear how proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100
All basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location, is comprehensively provided. Requirements are well-defined. Nevertheless, the critical omission of evaluation criteria renders the tender incomplete regarding the assessment process.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness55/100
The tender demonstrates fairness through a disclosed value, enabled e-procurement, and a very reasonable preparation period (over 9 months). Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. However, the lack of transparent evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and fairness of the selection process.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity
Practicality80/100
Electronic submission via eTenderNI is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Financing information (estimated value and developer funding responsibility) is also clear. A minor practical inconvenience is the absence of a direct URL for all procurement documents within the basic tender information.
•Direct document URL not provided in the basic information
Data Consistency90/100
The tender exhibits high data consistency with most key fields populated and logical dates. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and missing codes for the procedure types.
•Missing codes for procedure type
•'Liable Person' field empty
Sustainability95/100
This tender scores exceptionally high on sustainability, explicitly integrating strong green procurement aspects (environmentally friendly, green spaces, active travel, sustainability objectives), significant social considerations (multi-tenure housing, social homes, affordability, accessibility), and a clear focus on innovation.