Design and re-development of the EYFS area at Nova Primary Academy

This tender provides clear basic information and evaluation criteria but suffers from a lack of detailed requirements, absence of e-submission, and no focus on sustainability aspects.

The tender defines the procedure and CPV code appropriately, with no disputes. However, the absence of a clear reveal date and specific mandatory exclusion grounds identified by AI are minor compliance concerns.

The project description and high-level evaluation criteria (60% quality, 40% price) are clear. However, eligibility requirements are vague ("suitably qualified company"), and detailed criteria for assessing "quality" are not provided.

Basic information, value, duration, and documents are present. Significant gaps exist in providing detailed evaluation criteria, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial capacity requirements.

The tender value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, which promotes fairness. However, the absence of e-submission and detailed quality criteria reduces transparency and equal access for all potential bidders.

Contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The primary practical drawback is the lack of electronic submission, which can hinder participation and efficiency.

Key dates are logical, and there are no disputes. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for tender type/procedure and an empty "Liable Person" field. The 60/40 evaluation split is consistently mentioned across summaries.

The tender shows no integration of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it EU funded, indicating a complete lack of sustainability considerations.