Tenders

Rozwój przystanków autobusowych w Gminie Jõgeva

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 8 dni
Marzec 10, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Budownictwo
Numer Referencyjny
305926
Wartość
€101,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 10, 2026
Organizacja
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Total bid cost100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 10, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Marzec 03, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 10, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 10, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€101,000
Duration
5 months
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Budownictwo
79
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€524,963
Śr. liczba ofert
4.7
Konkurencja
Średnia
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
5,932 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Działania rozwojowe na 10 przystankach autobusowych w Gminie Jõgeva, w tym instalacja nowych wiat przystankowych na 7 przystankach i budowa zjazdu na dwóch przystankach.
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

15 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (6)
Obowiązkowe (3)
Zgodność (4)
Techniczne (1)
Finansowe (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-10 10:00:00.
--The bidder must electronically fill out the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The bidder must define and justify any business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS3
--The bidder must not fall under the exclusion grounds as specified in the ESPD.
--The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors subject to exclusion grounds (e.g., fraud, money laundering) will be involved.
--Subcontractors must not fall under exclusion grounds (e.g., fraud, money laundering).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidder must meet the qualification requirements specified in the ESPD.
--The bidder must prove the compliance and equivalence of the bid with the tender documents.
--If relying on the resources of another entity, the bidder must meet the specified conditions for such reliance.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must be capable of acting as the main contractor for the construction of bus stop shelters, responsible for performing all construction works or organizing them.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include a detailed price offer for various works and costs (e.g., road maintenance, temporary works, earthworks, construction preparation) as part of the cost table.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

7 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305926_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking first-tier subcontractors during contract execution, detailing exclusion grounds (e.g., fraud, money laundering) and requiring tenderers to provide relevant information about themselves and their subcontractors.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305926_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.7 KB

This document requires bidders to define and justify any business secrets, confirm they will not involve subcontractors subject to exclusion, and attest to the compliance and equivalence of their offer with the tender documents.

Pakkja peab esitama lisa 3- maksumuse tabeliXLS
Lisa 3 Maksumuse tabel (10 peatust).xlsx -- 129.9 KB

Bidders must submit a completed cost table detailing the price proposal for various works and expenses, including road maintenance, temporary works, earthworks, and construction preparation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305926_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The sole evaluation criterion for tender offers is the total bid cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum number of points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305926_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.8 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) template, outlining the requirements for bidder qualifications and exclusion grounds, which must be completed electronically.

juhised pakkujaleDOC
Hankedokument_Juhised pakkujale.docx -- 35.1 KB

This document provides general instructions for tenderers, clarifies the scope of the main contracting for bus stop waiting shelters, and sets out conditions for relying on the resources of another entity, including requirements for joint liability and submission of necessary documents.

Lisa 2. Lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 47.0 KB

This document is a draft contract for the construction works of Jõgeva municipality bus stop development, outlining the general terms and obligations between the client and the contractor.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

79
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender for bus stop development in Jõgeva municipality demonstrates good legal compliance and fairness, with clear requirements and objective evaluation criteria. However, the inability to analyze several key documents limits a full assessment of completeness and clarity.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami90/100

The tender adheres to national procurement regulations, utilizing standard procedures (Open Procedure) and the ESPD. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriately assigned. No disputes or suspensions are noted, indicating strong legal compliance.

Przejrzystość80/100

The project description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly stated. The AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable. However, the content of several important documents (e.g., technical specification, project plans) could not be analyzed, potentially leaving some details unassessed.

Content of several key documents (e.g., technical specification, project plans) could not be analyzed by AI, potentially impacting full clarity assessment.
Kompletność65/100

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are comprehensively provided. While 12 documents are listed, the inability to process 5 of them (including technical specifications and project documents) means the full scope of information is not accessible for analysis, thus limiting the assessment of overall completeness.

Five out of twelve tender documents (e.g., technical specification, project plans, ESPD XML) were not supported for AI analysis, preventing a comprehensive review of their content.
Uczciwość90/100

The tender exhibits high fairness with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable submission deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). The requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, and e-procurement is enabled.

Praktyczność75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and financing information is available. The duration is clearly specified. A minor practical concern is the absence of a specific contract start date, which could aid bidder planning.

Specific contract start date is not explicitly provided.
Spójność danych95/100

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent throughout the provided information, indicating high data integrity.

Zrównoważony rozwój40/100

The tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While co-financed, it is not explicitly stated as EU-funded in a way that would mandate higher sustainability standards.

Absence of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.
Not explicitly stated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

Mocne strony

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Reasonable submission deadlines and electronic submission support.
Good legal compliance with standard procedures and ESPD use.
Value disclosed and requirements appear generic, promoting fairness.

Wątpliwości

Inability to analyze content of several key tender documents (e.g., technical specification, project plans).
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Absence of a specific contract start date.

Rekomendacje

1. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in AI-analyzable formats for future tenders.
2. Consider incorporating specific sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where applicable.
3. Provide a clear estimated contract start date for better planning by bidders.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u