Savivaldybės kelio 200350K rekonstravimas nuo 0+000 km iki 0+650 km Turzos kaime, Rzepiennik Strzyżewski savivaldybėje

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a CPV code and a clear procedure. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and potential issues with the submission deadline's reasonableness (given the scope) slightly reduce the score. No disputes are reported, which is positive.

The description of the road reconstruction is clear, and the CPV code is provided. The availability of technical documentation and the SWZ (Statement of Reasons for Exclusion) contributes to clarity. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, and financial requirements makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand all necessary conditions.

Key information such as the title, reference number, organization, and contract duration are present. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While several documents are attached, the absence of detailed requirements in the main notice reduces overall completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The full document access is implied by the listed attachments. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria (beyond price and warranty mentioned in the notice summary) could be perceived as less fair, as bidders may not fully understand the basis of selection.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the lack of a specified contract start date and financing information makes it less practical for bidders to plan. The submission deadline, while provided, might be tight for a road reconstruction project of this nature, especially if detailed technical proposals are required.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The CPV code is consistent with the project description.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of emphasis on sustainability aspects results in a lower score in this category.