Besoin de l'aide d'un expert en appels d'offres ? Découvrez notre service de préparation d'appels d'offres
Retour aux appels d'offres

Kohila Health Trail, Stage II

Fermé

Date limite de soumission dépassée

La date limite de soumission de cet appel d'offres est dépassée et il n'accepte plus de candidatures. Les informations ci-dessous sont conservées à titre de référence.

Parcourir les appels d'offres actifs
Date limite
Expiré
9 février 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
304566
Valeur
€80,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
14 janvier 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

14 janvier 2026

Date limite pour les questions

2 février 2026

Date limite de soumission

9 février 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

9 février 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€80,000
Durée
5 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
86
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Projekteeritav terviseraja teine etapp viiakse kokku juba valmis ehitatud terviserajaga. Terviseraja teise etapi raja pikkus on ca 775 meetrit.
Soumission électronique

Lancer l'analyse des risques

Identifiez les risques potentiels, les incohérences et les signaux d'alerte dans l'ensemble des documents de l'appel d'offres. Obtenez un rapport de risque détaillé avec les niveaux de gravité et les recommandations d'atténuation.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Obtenez une stratégie gagnante générée par l'IA et adaptée à cet appel d'offres. Comprend un score de probabilité de succès, les opportunités et défis clés, les axes prioritaires de l'offre, une analyse du positionnement concurrentiel et des recommandations concrètes pour maximiser vos chances.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

21 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (9)
Obligatoire (2)
Conformité (5)
Technique (3)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--The bidder must review the qualification and exclusion conditions set by the contracting authority and complete the actual ESPD electronically.
--The bidder must submit the total cost of the offer without taxes.
--The bidder must declare business secrets (if any).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder must not be subject to the exclusion grounds set by the contracting authority in the qualification and exclusion conditions (ESPD).
--First-tier subcontractors must not have been involved in criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidder must meet the qualification conditions set by the contracting authority (ESPD).
--The bidder must be prepared to accept the scope of work, contractor obligations, and penalty clauses as described in the draft contract.
--The bidder must comply with all conditions presented in the tender documents and the legal acts of the Republic of Estonia.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must adhere to the scope and requirements of the Kohila health trail II stage construction works as defined in the technical description.
--The bidder must comply with the underlying project documentation.
--The bidder must adhere to the detailed technical solutions, including planning, pavement structures, and utility networks, as described in the main project document for Kohila health trail II stage.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The sole criterion for evaluating offers is the total cost of the offer without taxes.
--The bidder must submit unit prices and the total cost for general and preparatory works of Kohila health trail II stage.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

12 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304566_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the grounds for excluding first-tier subcontractors based on criminal convictions such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring tenderers to provide information regarding their subcontractors' reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304566_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.6 KB

This document details tender submission requirements, including how to declare business secrets, confirm compliance with procurement documents, complete the bid cost submission, and apply equivalence principles.

Vorm 3. Pakkumuse maksumuse esildisXLS
Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 15.4 KB

This document is a form for submitting the tender cost proposal, requiring bidders to fill in unit prices and total costs for general and preparatory works of the Kohila health trail construction, Stage II.

Vorm 2. Osalemise taotlusDOC
Vorm 2_Hankes osalemise taotlus.docx -- 11.9 KB

This form serves as the bidder's application for participation, confirming acceptance of tender conditions, bid validity, commitment to perform works as required, and includes information on intended subcontractors.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304566_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is the total offer price excluding taxes, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304566_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.5 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's qualification and exclusion criteria, intended for bidders to review but not to be submitted as the actual ESPD is completed electronically.

Hanke alusdokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument.docx -- 17.7 KB

This basic document invites bidders to submit proposals for the construction of the Kohila health trail's second stage in an open procurement procedure, in accordance with the specified conditions and the laws of the Republic of Estonia.

Lisa 1. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 28.8 KB

This document is a draft contract for the second stage of the Kohila health trail construction works, outlining the scope of work, contractor's obligations, and penalty clauses for breaches.

Lisa 2. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 17.2 KB

This document is the technical description for the construction works of the Kohila health trail's second stage, defining the project scope, requirements, and referencing the underlying project documentation.

ProjektdokumentatsioonSIG
Projektdokumentatsioon.asice -- 8.4 MB

Aucun résumé n'est disponible pour ce document.

PõhiprojektPDF
Rapla maakond, Kohila vald, Kohila alev Jõesa... -- 624.9 KB

This document is the main project design for the second stage of the Kohila health trail, detailing technical solutions including planning, pavement structures, and utility networks.

Vorm 1. VolikiriDOC
Vorm 1_ Ühise pakkumuse volikiri .docx -- 12.4 KB

This power of attorney form is for joint bidders to authorize one party to represent them in the tender procedure 'Kohila terviserada II etapp', performing all necessary actions from bid submission to contract signing.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

86
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for the Kohila health trail II stage is a straightforward construction procurement, emphasizing adherence to detailed technical specifications and evaluating offers solely on price. While clear in its core requirements, it presents some areas for improvement regarding flexibility and broader value considerations.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale100/100

The tender appears to be legally compliant, utilizing standard exclusion and qualification grounds via the ESPD and adhering to general procurement principles.

Clarté80/100

Most requirements are clearly stated, particularly the technical specifications and financial criteria. However, the requirement for 'information regarding the trustworthiness of their proposed subcontractors' lacks specific guidance on what information is required and how it will be assessed, potentially leading to ambiguity.

•Vague requirement for 'trustworthiness of subcontractors'.
Exhaustivité100/100

The tender documents seem comprehensive, covering all essential aspects from exclusion and eligibility to technical, financial, and submission requirements.

Équité100/100

The highly prescriptive technical requirements, demanding adherence to specific detailed solutions, combined with the sole evaluation criterion of lowest price, may limit the scope for innovative or alternative solutions from bidders. The vague 'trustworthiness' requirement could also introduce subjectivity.

•Highly prescriptive technical requirements may limit innovation and alternative solutions.
•Sole evaluation criterion (lowest price) may not capture best value.
Aspect pratique60/100

The tender process, including electronic submission and clear financial submission requirements, appears practical for bidders. The detailed technical specifications, while restrictive, provide clear guidance for execution.

Cohérence des données100/100

Based on the provided summaries and extracted requirements, there are no apparent inconsistencies in the tender documentation.

Durabilité0/100

The tender lacks explicit requirements or criteria related to environmental sustainability, social responsibility, or innovation, which could be relevant for a public health trail project.

•Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Lack of social criteria.

Points forts

Clear definition of project scope and technical adherence.
Use of ESPD for qualification and exclusion.
Electronic submission for efficiency.
Transparent evaluation criterion (lowest price).

Préoccupations

Highly prescriptive technical requirements limiting alternative solutions.
Vague requirement for subcontractor 'trustworthiness'.
Sole reliance on lowest price, potentially overlooking quality or long-term value.
Absence of sustainability or social criteria for a public infrastructure project.

Recommandations

1. Clarify the specific information required for assessing subcontractor 'trustworthiness' and the evaluation methodology.
2. Consider incorporating performance-based requirements or allowing for alternative technical solutions that meet functional objectives.
3. Explore the inclusion of relevant sustainability (e.g., material sourcing, environmental impact) or social criteria in future tenders.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes