Besoin de l'aide d'un expert en appels d'offres ? Découvrez notre service de préparation d'appels d'offres
Retour aux appels d'offres

Full-service vehicle lease

Fermé

Date limite de soumission dépassée

La date limite de soumission de cet appel d'offres est dépassée et il n'accepte plus de candidatures. Les informations ci-dessous sont conservées à titre de référence.

Parcourir les appels d'offres actifs
Date limite
Expiré
12 février 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
164148
Valeur
€21,600
Lieu
Latvia, Lettonie
Publié
28 janvier 2026
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

28 janvier 2026

Date limite pour les questions

5 février 2026

Date limite de soumission

12 février 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

12 février 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€21,600
Durée
48 mois
Lieu
Latvia
Type
Services
49
Score de qualité/100
Acceptable
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€458,670
Offres moyennes
4.2
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
90%
1,875 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Full-service vehicle lease

Lancer l'analyse des risques

Identifiez les risques potentiels, les incohérences et les signaux d'alerte dans l'ensemble des documents de l'appel d'offres. Obtenez un rapport de risque détaillé avec les niveaux de gravité et les recommandations d'atténuation.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Obtenez une stratégie gagnante générée par l'IA et adaptée à cet appel d'offres. Comprend un score de probabilité de succès, les opportunités et défis clés, les axes prioritaires de l'offre, une analyse du positionnement concurrentiel et des recommandations concrètes pour maximiser vos chances.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

10 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (5)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (2)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Proposals must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-02-12T11:00:00.
--Bidders must adhere to all submission requirements detailed in the "Nolikumus" document.
--Bidders must provide all other necessary documents as specified in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must meet the mandatory exclusion criteria detailed in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must satisfy the selection criteria outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a technical proposal that adheres to the requirements specified in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
--Bidders must meet the specific procurement requirements for full-service car rental as detailed in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a financial proposal in accordance with the requirements outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

2 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
164148_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260128133507.pdf -- 97.1 KB

This document contains procurement requirements, including exclusion and selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, other necessary documents, and the evaluation criteria for proposals for full-service car rental.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums.docx -- 72.1 KB

This document contains the regulations and administrative information for a procurement tender for full-service car rental, including submission requirements, evaluation criteria, and contract terms.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

49
Acceptable

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for full-service car rental exhibits significant transparency issues due to restricted document access, severely hindering clarity, fairness, and legal compliance despite an open procedure and e-procurement features.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale55/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and deadlines are reasonable. However, the critical issue of 'Restricted document access' significantly impacts legal compliance, as it prevents mandatory disclosure and transparency required by procurement regulations.

•Restricted document access, hindering mandatory disclosure requirements.
Clarté45/100

While the tender description is clear and AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized, the 'Restricted document access' means that the detailed requirements, evaluation criteria, and performance conditions are not publicly available. This severely compromises the clarity for potential bidders.

•Restricted document access, making detailed requirements and evaluation criteria inaccessible to bidders.
Exhaustivité50/100

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are provided. Documents are listed and summarized, indicating that all necessary information exists. However, 'Restricted document access' means the full tender package is not publicly available, making it incomplete from a bidder's perspective.

•Restricted document access, hindering full provision of tender details to the public.
Équité30/100

The open procedure and stated e-procurement support are positive. However, 'Restricted document access' is a fundamental breach of fairness and transparency. It prevents equal access to information, makes it impossible to verify the objectivity of evaluation criteria, and raises significant concerns about potential tailoring of requirements to specific companies.

•Restricted document access, preventing equal access to information and transparency of requirements/criteria.
•Inability to verify if requirements are generic due to restricted access, raising concerns about potential tailoring.
Aspect pratique50/100

Electronic submission is indicated, which is practical. The duration is clearly specified. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a major practical barrier for bidders, as they cannot easily obtain the necessary tender documents. The contract start date is also not specified.

•Restricted document access, posing a significant practical hurdle for bidders.
•Contract start date is not explicitly known.
Cohérence des données85/100

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent. While there are contradictions between automated flags (e.g., 'No e-submission', 'Missing evaluation criteria') and the explicit tender characteristics/document summaries, the core data provided within the tender information itself is largely consistent.

•Contradiction between 'Characteristics: E-Procurement' and 'Automated Check Results: No e-submission'.
•Contradiction between 'Issues/Flags: No evaluation criteria specified' and document content summaries.
Durabilité30/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

•Lack of green procurement criteria.
•Absence of social aspects.

Points forts

Open procurement procedure, promoting competition.
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly disclosed.
E-Procurement is indicated, facilitating electronic submission.
CPV code is appropriately assigned for the service type.
Location information is clearly provided.

Préoccupations

Critical issue of restricted document access, severely impacting transparency and fairness.
Inaccessibility of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria for bidders.
Potential for tailored requirements due to lack of public document access.
Absence of sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria.
Contradictions between automated checks and explicit tender characteristics/summaries.

Recommandations

1. Immediately ensure full and unrestricted public access to all tender documents to comply with transparency requirements.
2. Clearly specify the contract start date to provide complete project timeline information.
3. Consider integrating sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) into future tenders to align with modern procurement best practices.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes