Retour aux appels d'offres

Concession publicitaire du Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park (QEOP)

Ouvert
Date limite
12 jours restants
Mars 15, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Autre
Référence
015468-2026
Valeur
£180,000
Lieu
Inner London - East, Royaume-Uni
Publié
Février 23, 2026
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 19, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 08, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 15, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Avril 12, 2026

Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
£180,000
Durée
36 mois
Lieu
Inner London - East
Type
Autre
65
Score de qualité/100
Bon

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

La London Legacy Development Corporation recherche un partenaire de type agence média pour vendre du contenu publicitaire numérique sur ses actifs situés dans le Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park et le London Aquatics Centre. Cette concession vise à maximiser les revenus de ces actifs et à obtenir le meilleur résultat financier pour les deux parties.

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

11 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (2)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (5)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted electronically via the Delta eSourcing portal.
--The submission deadline is 2026-03-15T00:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidding entity must be a Media Agency.
--The bidder must demonstrate capability in selling digital advertising content.
--The bidder must demonstrate capability in maximizing revenue from advertising assets.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must propose a financial model designed to maximize revenue from the specified assets.
--The bidder's financial proposal must aim to achieve the best financial outcome for both the London Legacy Development Corporation and the partner.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

Aucun document traité n'est disponible pour cet appel d'offres.

Les documents apparaîtront ici une fois qu'ils auront été téléchargés et analysés.

65
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender provides clear basic information and supports electronic submission, but suffers from significant incompleteness due to missing evaluation criteria, detailed eligibility/exclusion grounds, and the lack of content for attached documents. Its fairness is compromised by the absence of transparent evaluation criteria.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale70/100

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined. There are no reported disputes. However, the missing reveal date and the explicit absence of detailed eligibility, exclusion, and evaluation criteria in the provided summary are significant transparency and compliance gaps, even for a below-threshold tender.

Missing tender reveal date.
No detailed mandatory exclusion grounds specified.
Clarté55/100

The overall objective and service description are clear. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria, detailed eligibility/exclusion grounds, and specific performance conditions significantly reduces the clarity for potential bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified.
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
Exhaustivité60/100

Basic information, key dates, and estimated value are provided. However, the critical lack of content for the 9 listed tender documents, coupled with the explicit absence of evaluation criteria and detailed eligibility/exclusion grounds, makes this tender significantly incomplete from a bidder's perspective.

No content provided for the 9 listed tender documents.
No evaluation criteria specified.
Équité65/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and electronic submission is supported, which promotes equal access. The requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the critical absence of transparent evaluation criteria severely impacts the fairness and objectivity of the procurement process, as bidders cannot understand the basis of selection.

No evaluation criteria specified, severely impacting transparency and objectivity.
Lack of content for listed tender documents in the summary raises concerns about full information access.
Aspect pratique80/100

Electronic submission is clearly supported via a dedicated portal, and direct links are provided. The contract start date and duration are specified, making it practical for bidders to plan their engagement.

Cohérence des données85/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and 'Code' for Type/Procedure, and the missing reveal date.

Missing 'Liable Person' field.
Missing 'Code' for Type and Procedure fields.
Durabilité20/100

There is no mention of any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information. This indicates a significant lack of integration of modern sustainability principles.

No green procurement aspects mentioned.
No social criteria mentioned.

Points forts

Clear description of the service required.
Electronic submission via a dedicated portal is supported.
Key financial and timeline details (value, duration, start date) are specified.
CPV code is correctly assigned.
Value is disclosed and not classified.

Préoccupations

Critical absence of evaluation criteria.
Lack of detailed eligibility and mandatory exclusion grounds.
No content provided for the 9 listed tender documents.
Missing reveal date for the tender.
No mention of sustainability, social, or innovation aspects.

Recommandations

1. Publish comprehensive evaluation criteria, including weighting and methodology, to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Provide full tender documentation with detailed eligibility and exclusion grounds to ensure completeness.
3. Clearly state performance indicators and how revenue maximization will be measured to enhance clarity.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline