Conducting an archaeological survey in Narva Old Town
SuljettuAlkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus
Suorita riskianalyysi
Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.
Kirjaudu sisäänVoittostrategia
Hanki tekoälyllä luotu voittostrategia, joka on räätälöity tähän tarjouskilpailuun. Sisältää voiton todennäköisyyspisteet, keskeiset mahdollisuudet ja haasteet, suositellut tarjouksen painopistealueet, kilpailuasemanäkemykset ja toimintasuositukset mahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.
Kirjaudu sisäänKilpailijat
Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.
Kirjaudu sisäänVaatimukset ja pätevyydet
21 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa
Vaatimusten esikatselu
Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin
Asiakirjat
9 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla
This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses and requiring tenderers to provide information regarding their subcontractors' reliability.
This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tender power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, restrictions on subcontractor involvement, confirmation of tender compliance, and the structure for submitting the tender cost.
This document is a tender cost submission form for archaeological research, detailing expenses by category with specific percentage limits for certain cost items.
This document is a power of attorney for submitting a joint tender, designating a lead bidder and confirming the joint and several liability of the joint bidders, to be submitted only if a joint tender is made.
This document specifies that bids for the archaeological survey tender will be evaluated solely based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
This explanatory Hankepass (ESPD) outlines the conditions and required information regarding the tenderer's company, financial, and technical capabilities for conducting the archaeological survey in Narva Old Town.
This document is the procurement document for Aktsiaselts Narva Vesi's public tender "Archaeological survey in Narva Old Town," outlining the terms and requirements of the simple procurement procedure.
This document outlines the technical requirements and scope of the archaeological survey to be conducted within the Narva Old Town stormwater sewerage construction project, including the investigation and documentation of cultural layers and finds within protected heritage sites.
This document is a draft service contract for conducting an archaeological survey in Narva Old Town, detailing the scope of services, contractor's obligations, required qualifications, and timelines for fieldwork related to stormwater sewerage construction.
Asiakirjojen esikatselu
Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin
Hankinnan laatupisteet
This tender for archaeological services in Narva Old Town demonstrates good overall quality, characterized by clear requirements, transparent evaluation criteria, and robust legal compliance for a simplified procedure. While strong in most areas, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.
Pisteiden erittely
The tender adheres well to legal requirements for a simplified procedure, with a clearly defined procedure type, appropriate CPV codes, reasonable submission period, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and mandatory exclusion grounds indicates compliance with national and EU procurement principles.
The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and requirements are well-documented and understandable through categorized AI-extracted requirements and specific tender documents. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) and performance conditions are clearly specified.
All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is provided. A comprehensive set of 10 documents is attached, with most having content summaries, ensuring a complete information package.
The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value (despite a minor conflicting flag), reasonable deadlines, objective evaluation criteria based solely on price, and enabled e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and financing conditions refer to the draft contract. However, a direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the basic information block.
Key fields are generally well-populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. The only minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, which contradicts the disclosed estimated value.
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Vahvuudet
Huolenaiheet
Suositukset
Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu
Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin
Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa
AI-avustaja
Hei! Olen tekoälyavustajasi tässä hankinnassa. Voin auttaa sinua ymmärtämään vaatimuksia, määräaikoja, kelpoisuuskriteerejä ja tarjoamaan strategisia oivalluksia.
Luottokorttia ei vaadita