Conducting an archaeological survey in Narva Old Town
GeslotenOriginele aanbestedingsbeschrijving
Risicoanalyse uitvoeren
Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.
InloggenWinststrategie
Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.
InloggenConcurrenten
Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.
InloggenVereisten & Kwalificaties
21 vereisten over 5 categorieën
Voorbeeld van vereisten
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
Documenten
9 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen
This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses and requiring tenderers to provide information regarding their subcontractors' reliability.
This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tender power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, restrictions on subcontractor involvement, confirmation of tender compliance, and the structure for submitting the tender cost.
This document is a tender cost submission form for archaeological research, detailing expenses by category with specific percentage limits for certain cost items.
This document is a power of attorney for submitting a joint tender, designating a lead bidder and confirming the joint and several liability of the joint bidders, to be submitted only if a joint tender is made.
This document specifies that bids for the archaeological survey tender will be evaluated solely based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
This explanatory Hankepass (ESPD) outlines the conditions and required information regarding the tenderer's company, financial, and technical capabilities for conducting the archaeological survey in Narva Old Town.
This document is the procurement document for Aktsiaselts Narva Vesi's public tender "Archaeological survey in Narva Old Town," outlining the terms and requirements of the simple procurement procedure.
This document outlines the technical requirements and scope of the archaeological survey to be conducted within the Narva Old Town stormwater sewerage construction project, including the investigation and documentation of cultural layers and finds within protected heritage sites.
This document is a draft service contract for conducting an archaeological survey in Narva Old Town, detailing the scope of services, contractor's obligations, required qualifications, and timelines for fieldwork related to stormwater sewerage construction.
Voorbeeld van documenten
Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken
Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding
This tender for archaeological services in Narva Old Town demonstrates good overall quality, characterized by clear requirements, transparent evaluation criteria, and robust legal compliance for a simplified procedure. While strong in most areas, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.
Scoreoverzicht
The tender adheres well to legal requirements for a simplified procedure, with a clearly defined procedure type, appropriate CPV codes, reasonable submission period, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and mandatory exclusion grounds indicates compliance with national and EU procurement principles.
The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and requirements are well-documented and understandable through categorized AI-extracted requirements and specific tender documents. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) and performance conditions are clearly specified.
All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is provided. A comprehensive set of 10 documents is attached, with most having content summaries, ensuring a complete information package.
The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value (despite a minor conflicting flag), reasonable deadlines, objective evaluation criteria based solely on price, and enabled e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and financing conditions refer to the draft contract. However, a direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the basic information block.
Key fields are generally well-populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. The only minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, which contradicts the disclosed estimated value.
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Sterke punten
Aandachtspunten
Aanbevelingen
Voorbeeld van AI-score
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten
AI Copilot
Hallo! Ik ben je AI-assistent voor deze aanbesteding. Ik kan je helpen bij het begrijpen van vereisten, deadlines, geschiktheidscriteria en strategische inzichten bieden.
Geen creditcard vereist