Tarvitsetko tarjousasiantuntijan apua? Katso tarjousten valmistelupalvelumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Purchase of presentation equipment for the exhibition „I want to play!“

Suljettu

Jättömääräaika on umpeutunut

Tämän tarjouskilpailun jättömääräaika on umpeutunut, eikä se enää ota vastaan hakemuksia. Alla olevat tiedot säilytetään viitteellisinä.

Selaa aktiivisia tarjouskilpailuja
Määräaika
Päättynyt
2. helmikuuta 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Tarvikkeet
Viite
305232
Arvo
€25,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
22. tammikuuta 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

22. tammikuuta 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

26. tammikuuta 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

2. helmikuuta 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

2. helmikuuta 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

6. helmikuuta 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€25,000
Kesto
2 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Tarvikkeet
62
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€104,435
Keskim. tarjoukset
2.5
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
311 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Hange hõlmab Teatri- ja Muusikamuuseumi ruumides (Müürivahe 12, Tallinn) avatava tegevusnäituse "Tahan mängida!" digilahenduste esitlusseadmete tarnet.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Hanki tekoälyllä luotu voittostrategia, joka on räätälöity tähän tarjouskilpailuun. Sisältää voiton todennäköisyyspisteet, keskeiset mahdollisuudet ja haasteet, suositellut tarjouksen painopistealueet, kilpailuasemanäkemykset ja toimintasuositukset mahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

Kirjaudu sisään

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

20 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (4)
Pakollinen (2)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (4)
Tekninen (7)
Taloudellinen (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The economic operator must declare compliance with the exclusion grounds and qualification criteria in the electronically completed ESPD.
--The bidder must confirm that the bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--The bid cost must be submitted using the document "305232_Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete ostmine_Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The economic operator must not be subject to any exclusion grounds specified by the contracting authority.
--The economic operator must declare compliance with the exclusion grounds in the electronically completed ESPD (European Single Procurement Document).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bid must comply with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--Conditional bids are prohibited.
--The economic operator must declare compliance with the qualification criteria in the electronically completed ESPD.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--The bid must meet the technical requirements and terms of reference for the purchase of presentation equipment for the "I want to play!" exhibition.
--The bid must comply with the detailed technical specifications for presentation equipment (screens, media players, speakers), including desired models, as described in Annex 1.
--The bid must comply with the detailed technical specifications and functional requirements for digital exhibits (video content, activation mechanisms, presentation methods) as described in Annex 2.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must include a detailed price offer for the purchase of presentation equipment (screens, players, speakers) for the "I want to play!" exhibition, in accordance with the specified specifications.
--The bid price is an evaluation criterion (40% weight).
--The bid cost must be submitted using the specific form.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

9 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
305232_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.6 KB

This document requires bidders to confirm that their tender proposal complies with all conditions set forth in the procurement documents, prohibiting conditional bids.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305232_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.6 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the procurement of presentation equipment for the "I want to play!" exhibition, where price accounts for 40% and quality for 60%, covering compliance with the terms of reference, delivery time, warranty period, and response time.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305232_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.6 KB

This explanatory document outlines the contracting authority's conditions regarding exclusion grounds and qualification criteria, which companies must declare in the electronically submitted European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Tehniline kirjeldus / lähteülesanneDOC
305232_Tahan mängida_Digilahenduste esitlusse... -- 53.0 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications and terms of reference for the procurement of presentation equipment for the "I want to play!" exhibition.

LepinguprojektDOC
305232_Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete ostmine_... -- 44.5 KB

This draft contract outlines the purchase, delivery, and necessary maintenance of presentation equipment and technology for the "Tahan mängida!" exhibition, covering the period from March 6, 2026, to August 31, 2029.

Pakkumuse maksumuse vormXLS
305232_Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete ostmine_... -- 20.2 KB

This document is an offer cost form requiring bidders to provide a detailed price proposal for the purchase of exhibition presentation equipment, such as screens, players, and speakers, for the "I want to play!" exhibition, according to specified parameters.

TK lisa 1 Esitlusseadmete spetsifikatsioonXLS
Lisa 1 Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete spetsifi... -- 22.2 KB

This document details the technical specifications and desired models for presentation equipment, such as screens, media players, and speakers, required for the "I want to play!" exhibition.

TK lisa 2 digieksponaatide kirjeldusXLS
Lisa 2 Tahan mängida_digieksponaatide kirjeld... -- 76.9 KB

This document details the technical specifications and functional requirements for the digital exhibits of the "Tahan mängida!" exhibition, including video content, activation mechanisms, and presentation methods.

TK lisa 3 Näituse ruumiplaanZIP
Lisa 3 Näituse ruumiplaan.zip -- 19.7 MB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

62
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

Overall, this tender is well-structured with comprehensive documentation, but it contains critical inconsistencies regarding evaluation criteria weighting and contract duration that require immediate clarification. These issues significantly impact clarity, fairness, and data consistency.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears generally compliant with national procurement regulations for a simplified procedure of this value. Deadlines are reasonable, CPV codes are appropriate, and standard exclusion grounds are applied via ESPD. However, the significant internal inconsistencies could lead to legal challenges if not rectified.

•Potential legal risk due to contradictory evaluation criteria weighting and contract duration inconsistencies.
Selkeys60/100

The description of the procurement object is clear, and requirements are generally well-documented. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a severe contradiction in the weighting of evaluation criteria, where individual quality sub-criteria are each assigned 60% weight, while the overall quality weight is also 60%. This is a critical flaw that creates significant ambiguity.

•Contradictory weighting of evaluation criteria (e.g., multiple 60% quality weights for sub-criteria when overall quality is 60%).
•Ambiguity regarding 'desired models' in technical specifications; it should be clear if equivalents are accepted.
Täydellisyys70/100

Most essential information, including title, organization, value, and deadlines, is provided. A comprehensive set of tender documents is attached. However, there is a notable inconsistency in the stated contract duration between the basic information (2 months) and the detailed requirements/draft contract (maintenance until 2029).

•Inconsistency in contract duration (2 months in basic info vs. maintenance until 2029 in requirements/draft contract).
Reiluus65/100

The tender supports e-procurement and electronic submission, promoting equal access. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. However, the contradictory evaluation criteria weighting severely undermines transparency and fairness in how bids will be assessed. The mention of 'desired models' in technical specifications could also potentially limit competition if not explicitly allowing for equivalent alternatives.

•Contradictory weighting of evaluation criteria creates an unfair and opaque bidding environment.
•'Desired models' in technical specifications could potentially tailor requirements to specific companies if equivalents are not clearly allowed.
Käytännöllisyys65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and a contract start date is provided. However, the significant inconsistency in the stated contract duration makes it practically challenging for bidders to accurately understand the full scope of the engagement and prepare a comprehensive, long-term price offer that includes maintenance services until 2029.

•Inconsistent contract duration makes it difficult for bidders to plan and price the full scope of work accurately.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus40/100

While key fields are populated and no disputes are detected, there are two critical data inconsistencies. Firstly, the contract duration is stated as 2 months in the basic information but extends to August 2029 for maintenance services in the requirements and draft contract. Secondly, the evaluation criteria weighting is contradictory, with individual quality sub-criteria each listed as 60% while the overall quality weight is also 60%.

•Critical inconsistency in contract duration (2 months vs. maintenance until 2029).
•Critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria weighting (multiple 60% quality weights for sub-criteria).
Kestävyys20/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social, or innovation aspects. It is also not EU-funded, which often entails higher sustainability standards.

•Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Lack of social or innovation aspects.

Vahvuudet

Clear description of the procurement object and scope.
Supports e-procurement and electronic submission for accessibility.
Estimated value and key deadlines are clearly disclosed.
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided, including a draft contract.
Evaluation criteria (price vs. quality split) are defined, though sub-criteria weighting is problematic.

Huolenaiheet

Critical contradiction in the weighting of evaluation sub-criteria (e.g., multiple 60% quality weights).
Significant inconsistency in the stated contract duration (2 months vs. maintenance until 2029).
Mention of 'desired models' in technical specifications could limit competition if equivalents are not explicitly allowed.
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is slightly ambiguous, though the value is stated.

Suositukset

1. Immediately clarify and correct the evaluation criteria weighting to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Harmonize the stated contract duration across all tender documents and basic information to accurately reflect the full scope of the engagement.
3. Clarify whether 'desired models' in the technical specifications allow for equivalent alternatives to promote broader competition.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa